Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/36447, first published .
Comparing the Psychological Effects of Manikin-Based and Augmented Reality–Based Simulation Training: Within-Subjects Crossover Study

Comparing the Psychological Effects of Manikin-Based and Augmented Reality–Based Simulation Training: Within-Subjects Crossover Study

Comparing the Psychological Effects of Manikin-Based and Augmented Reality–Based Simulation Training: Within-Subjects Crossover Study

Journals

  1. Toohey S, Wray A, Hunter J, Saadat S, Boysen-Osborn M, Smart J, Wiechmann W, Pressman S. Authors’ Response to the Validity of Cortisol and Galvanic Skin Responses for Measuring Student Stress During Training. JMIR Medical Education 2023;9:e50902 View
  2. Sonawane U, Kasetti P. How Valid Are Cortisol and Galvanic Skin Responses in Measuring Student Stress During Training? Comment on the Psychological Effects of Simulation Training. JMIR Medical Education 2023;9:e45340 View
  3. Patel D, Alismail A. Relationship Between Cognitive Load Theory, Intrinsic Motivation and Emotions in Healthcare Professions Education: A Perspective on the Missing Link. Advances in Medical Education and Practice 2024;Volume 15:57 View
  4. Tene T, Vique López D, Valverde Aguirre P, Orna Puente L, Vacacela Gomez C. Virtual reality and augmented reality in medical education: an umbrella review. Frontiers in Digital Health 2024;6 View
  5. Xu F, Zhou T, Nguyen T, Bao H, Lin C, Du J. Integrating augmented reality and LLM for enhanced cognitive support in critical audio communications. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2025;194:103402 View
  6. Rainforth C, John A, Brown A. Augmented Reality in Ward Round-Based Simulation: Exploring Student Experiences and Impact on Confidence. Cureus 2024 View