Accessibility settings

JMIR Medical Education

Technology, innovation, and openness in medical education in the information age.

Editor-in-Chief:

Blake J. Lesselroth, MD MBI FACP FAMIA, University of Oklahoma | OU-Tulsa Schusterman Center; University of Victoria, British Columbia


Impact Factor 13.9 More information about Impact Factor CiteScore 16.0 More information about CiteScore

JMIR Medical Education is an open access, peer-reviewed journal focusing on technology, innovation, and openness in medical education.This includes e-learning and virtual training, which has gained critical relevance in the (post-)COVID world. Another focus is on how to train health professionals to use digital tools. We publish original research, reviews, viewpoint, and policy papers on innovation and technology in medical education. As an open access journal, we have a special interest in open and free tools and digital learning objects for medical education and urge authors to make their tools and learning objects freely available (we may also publish them as a Multimedia Appendix). We also invite submissions of non-conventional articles (e.g., open medical education material and software resources that are not yet evaluated but free for others to use/implement). 

In our "Students' Corner," we invite students and trainees from various health professions to submit short essays and viewpoints on all aspects of medical education, particularly suggestions on improving medical education and suggestions for new technologies, applications, and approaches. 

The journal is indexed in MEDLINEPubMed, PubMed Central, Scopus, DOAJ, and the Science Citation Index Expanded (Clarivate).

JMIR Medical Education received a 2025 Impact Factor of 13.9, ranking Q1 in Education, Scientific Disciplines (1/89).

JMIR Medical Education received a Scopus CiteScore of 16.0 (2025), placing it in the 98th percentile (20/1698) as a first quartile (Q1) journal in the field of Education, and in the 97th percentile (19/669) as a first quartile (Q1) journal in the field of General Medicine.


Recent Articles

Dental students reviewing dental chart and x-ray on computer screen
Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Medical Education

Entering clinical training, dental students must learn to read tooth-centered electronic dental records, but limited teaching time in patient-centered clinics can leave gaps in chart-reading literacy. Multimodal large language models (LLMs) that process dental record images may offer scalable educational support, yet their performance has not been benchmarked.

Young student with curly hair studying on a laptop in a library
Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Medical Education

Generative AI tools became widely available to the public in November 2022. The extent to which these tools have been used by medical school applicants during the admissions process is unknown.

Medical professionals in scrubs collaborating in a modern hospital hallway
Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Medical Education

High-quality problem-based learning (PBL) during internship is resource-intensive and difficult to scale without consistent facilitation. Although generative AI is increasingly used in health professions education, many applications remain on-demand answer tools that may not reproduce core PBL processes.

Student interacts with AR character on campus with modern buildings and lake.
Evaluation of Medical Education

Large language model (LLM)–based AI teaching agents are increasingly used in medical education, yet their pedagogical quality is typically judged by platform-generated scores whose scoring criteria are undisclosed and may not reflect the teaching quality of the agent.

Diverse team collaborating on a laptop in a modern office setting.
Evaluation of Medical Education

The Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) has been central to medical school admissions in North America, though its necessity in holistic selection processes remains debated. The COVID-19 pandemic’s suspension of MCAT testing sessions allowed institutions to explore alternative admission criteria. Additionally, global challenges in test administration underscore the vulnerability of systems dependent on a single standardized test.

Two Black doctors in white coats looking at tablets during a medical discussion.
Medical Education in the Developing World and Resource-Poor Settings

Index case testing (ICT) is an effective strategy for HIV case finding, but implementation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is often limited by cost and logistical challenges. Traditional ICT training—centralized and in-person—is costly, disrupts service delivery, and varies in quality.

Nurses practice patient care on a medical mannequin in a simulation lab.
New Methods and Approaches in Medical Education

Communication during crisis management involves not only the exchange of clinical information but also the expression and regulation of emotional tone and sentiment, which may reflect clinician performance during a critical incident. In simulation-based medical education, these emotional dynamics are rarely measured objectively, limiting the ability to capture aspects of performance relevant to competency assessment.

Doctor discusses health with diverse group in a meeting
Theme Issue 2025: Bias, Diversity, Inclusion, and Cultural Competence in Medical Education

Spanish-speaking patients who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other minority sexual orientations and gender identities (LGBTQ+) may encounter overlapping barriers in clinical care related to language discordance, misgendering, heteronormative questioning, and culturally unresponsive communication. These barriers can undermine trust, limit disclosure, and negatively affect care experiences and continuity of care. At the same time, medical Spanish curricula in the United States remain highly variable in content, structure, and assessment, and inclusive, bias-aware communication has not been consistently integrated into language training for health professions learners. Our prior qualitative work with Latinx, Hispanic, and Spanish-origin LGBTQ+ adults identified communication priorities directly relevant to educational design, including respectful forms of address, open-ended relationship language, broader recognition of family structures, and reduced reliance on binary or heteronormative assumptions. Our prior curricular work has also shown that structured medical Spanish instruction using self-study, faculty-led teaching, peer support, standardized patient encounters, and performance-based assessment can be implemented in undergraduate medical education. This tutorial presents a patient-informed framework for developing an inclusive medical Spanish module to address bias in clinical communication. Rather than reporting a new intervention study, it synthesizes prior qualitative findings and prior curricular experience to provide practical guidance for educators. The framework describes how to translate patient-reported communication priorities into curricular design principles, learning objectives, technology-enhanced preparatory activities, standardized patient and live-practice components, feedback and assessment strategies, and implementation planning. It argues that inclusive communication should not be treated as optional cultural content or as a narrow language add-on but as a core component of competent clinical performance in Spanish-language care. This tutorial is intended for medical educators, language educators, course directors, and simulation teams seeking to strengthen language-concordant and bias-aware communication training in medical Spanish. By linking patient-informed findings to concrete educational design choices, the framework offers a practical model for integrating inclusive communication throughout instruction, simulation, and assessment. A patient-informed approach of this kind may help health professions programs move beyond general statements about inclusion and toward more deliberate preparation of learners to communicate respectfully and effectively with Spanish-speaking LGBTQ+ patients.

Medical professionals study human anatomy and biology with futuristic holographic displays.
Viewpoint and Opinions on Innovation in Medical Education

This paper critically assesses the role of generative AI in anatomical illustration, identifying fundamental barriers that currently preclude AI from replacing human medical illustrators. Despite the promise of unprecedented efficiency, contemporary models exhibit persistent anatomical inaccuracies and “hallucinations” of nonexistent structures—flaws stemming from statistical pattern-matching rather than genuine anatomical understanding. These systems further lack pedagogical intent, clinical context, and the capacity for deliberate visual judgment, while raising unresolved ethical and copyright concerns regarding training data. Although a specialized AI for this purpose is theoretically feasible, its development as a standalone goal remains economically nonviable given the niche nature of the profession. Rather than replacing human illustrators, AI’s future role will be augmentative, with the requisite anatomical intelligence likely emerging as a byproduct of broader advances in clinical applications such as surgical planning and personalized medicine. For AI-generated imagery to become educationally and clinically reliable, it will require rigorous human supervision, curated gold standard datasets, and a foundation of genuine anatomical comprehension.

Doctor consulting with patient, surrounded by digital representations of diverse individuals, representing healthcare technology.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Medical Education

Generative AI is driving medical education from digital support toward intelligent, interactive learning environments. The cultivation of doctor-patient communication skills requires not only technical proficiency but also communication competence, emotional sensitivity, and ethical judgment. This paper proposes a conceptual framework for AI-driven digital standardized patients (AI-SPs) to provide new approaches for communication training, humanistic education, and emotional engagement in medical curricula. This viewpoint integrates research findings from educational technology and medical education, elaborating the framework from 4 dimensions: system architecture, multimodal interaction, personality modeling, and ethical considerations. AI-SPs can provide adaptive, emotionally responsive interactions in repeatable, controllable simulated scenarios, enabling learners to experience diverse patient characteristics and clinical situations. The proposed “future learning” framework emphasizes personalization, contextualization, and reflective learning. During implementation, attention must be paid to data privacy, algorithmic bias, and human supervision. AI-SPs represent an extension of the traditional standardized patient model. They facilitate human-AI collaborative learning, support the cultivation of empathy, and provide a new pathway for the appropriate application of generative AI in medical education.

VR scene with hands reaching for a glove dispenser, red and blue buttons labeled "Patient ist hirntot" and "Patient nicht hirntot
Design of Educational Technology

Simulation-based medical education is essential for improving patient safety. In virtual reality (VR)–based simulation, immersion is primarily generated through visual and auditory cues, while other sensory modalities are typically absent. This sensory limitation may reduce the emergence of authentic safety-relevant behaviors. Olfaction plays an important role in clinical reasoning, risk perception, and self-protective behavior and is closely linked to memory and emotion. Although olfactory cues have been shown to influence hand hygiene behavior in real or simulated environments, their targeted integration into fully immersive VR-based medical simulation has not been systematically examined.

Preprints Open for Peer Review

We are working in partnership with