This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Reviews in Medical Education (88) Testing and Assessment in Medical Education (110) Generative Language Models Including ChatGPT (790) Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Medical Education (225) New Methods and Approaches in Medical Education (411) New Resources for Medical Education (128)

Published on in Vol 11 (2025)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/68070, first published .
Evaluating the Potential and Accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5 and 4.0 in Medical Licensing and In-Training Examinations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Evaluating the Potential and Accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5 and 4.0 in Medical Licensing and In-Training Examinations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Evaluating the Potential and Accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5 and 4.0 in Medical Licensing and In-Training Examinations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors of this article:

Anila Jaleel1 Author Orcid Image ;   Umair Aziz1 Author Orcid Image ;   Ghulam Farid1 Author Orcid Image ;   Muhammad Zahid Bashir1 Author Orcid Image ;   Tehmasp Rehman Mirza1 Author Orcid Image ;   Syed Mohammad Khizar Abbas1 Author Orcid Image ;   Shiraz Aslam1 Author Orcid Image ;   Rana Muhammad Hassaan Sikander1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (5) Tweetations Metrics

Journals

  1. de Boer H, Young G, Bouwer H, Heath K. ChatGPT’s performance on a specialist forensic pathology examination: implications for forensic pathologists and non-specialists. International Journal of Legal Medicine 2025 View
  2. Fu Q, Ji W, Fan Y, Yao J, Song M, Yan Q. Systematic Mining of Bioactive Compounds for Wound Healing From Cayratia Japonica Exosome-Like Nanovesicles: A Workflow Combining LC-MS and DeepSeek Models. JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology 2026;7:e80539 View
  3. Zouakia Z, Logak E, Szymczak A, Jais J, Burgun A, Tsopra R. AI-Driven Objective Structured Clinical Examination Generation in Digital Health Education: Comparative Analysis of Three GPT-4o Configurations. JMIR Medical Education 2026;12:e82116 View
  4. SEQUI M, LOMBARDO R, COPPOLA L, ROSATO E, ROMAGNOLI M, DE CILLIS S, CHECCUCCI E, AMPARORE D, RAGONESE M, FOSCHI N, SANTARELLI V, SPATAFORA P, GALLO G, PAGLIARULO V, TEMA G, NACCHIA A, CICIONE A, FRANCO A, PASTORE A, AL SALHI Y, ROCCO B, GACCI M, FIORI C, FINAZZI E, SCIARRA A, TUBARO A, DE NUNZIO C. Accuracy, readability, and understandability of EAU Guidelines Bot for urinary infections guidelines. Minerva Urology and Nephrology 2026;78(1) View
  5. López-Úbeda P, Martín-Noguerol T, Luna A. Radiology Board-Style Examinations and LLMs: A Scoping Review of Model Performance. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2026 View