Published on in Vol 11 (2025)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/68070, first published .
Evaluating the Potential and Accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5 and 4.0 in Medical Licensing and In-Training Examinations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Evaluating the Potential and Accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5 and 4.0 in Medical Licensing and In-Training Examinations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Evaluating the Potential and Accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5 and 4.0 in Medical Licensing and In-Training Examinations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journals

  1. de Boer H, Young G, Bouwer H, Heath K. ChatGPT’s performance on a specialist forensic pathology examination: implications for forensic pathologists and non-specialists. International Journal of Legal Medicine 2025 View
  2. Fu Q, Ji W, Fan Y, Yao J, Song M, Yan Q. Systematic Mining of Bioactive Compounds for Wound Healing From Cayratia Japonica Exosome-Like Nanovesicles: A Workflow Combining LC-MS and DeepSeek Models. JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology 2026;7:e80539 View
  3. Zouakia Z, Logak E, Szymczak A, Jais J, Burgun A, Tsopra R. AI-Driven Objective Structured Clinical Examination Generation in Digital Health Education: Comparative Analysis of Three GPT-4o Configurations. JMIR Medical Education 2026;12:e82116 View