This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

New Resources for Medical Education (118) Simulation (168) Preliminary Experiences with New Educational Technology (42) Student/Learners Perceptions and Experiences with Educational Technology (114) Graduate and Postgraduate Education for Health Professionals (137)

Published on in Vol 11 (2025)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/71139, first published .
Comparing the Perceived Realism and Adequacy of Venipuncture Training on an in-House Developed 3D-Printed Arm With a Commercially Available Arm: Randomized, Single-Blind, Cross-Over Study

Comparing the Perceived Realism and Adequacy of Venipuncture Training on an in-House Developed 3D-Printed Arm With a Commercially Available Arm: Randomized, Single-Blind, Cross-Over Study

Comparing the Perceived Realism and Adequacy of Venipuncture Training on an in-House Developed 3D-Printed Arm With a Commercially Available Arm: Randomized, Single-Blind, Cross-Over Study

Authors of this article:

Susan Gijsbertje Brouwer de Koning1 Author Orcid Image ;   Amy Hofman2 Author Orcid Image ;   Sonja Gerber3 Author Orcid Image ;   Vera Lagerburg4, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Michelle van den Boorn1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (1) Tweetations Metrics

Journals

  1. Brouwer de Koning S, Hofman A, Gerber S, Lagerburg V, van den Boorn M. Correction: Comparing the Perceived Realism and Adequacy of Venipuncture Training on an in-House Developed 3D-Printed Arm With a Commercially Available Arm: Randomized, Single-Blind, Cross-Over Study. JMIR Medical Education 2025;11:e89670 View