This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Theme Issue: ChatGPT and Generative Language Models in Medical Education (84) Research Instruments, Questionnaires, and Tools (576) Artificial Intelligence (1371) Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions (2410) Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Medical Education (78) Artificial Intelligence (86) Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Natural Language Processing for Public Health (36) Chatbots and Conversational Agents (531)

Published on in Vol 9 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/48254, first published .
Assessing Health Students' Attitudes and Usage of ChatGPT in Jordan: Validation Study

Assessing Health Students' Attitudes and Usage of ChatGPT in Jordan: Validation Study

Assessing Health Students' Attitudes and Usage of ChatGPT in Jordan: Validation Study

Authors of this article:

Malik Sallam1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Nesreen A Salim3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Muna Barakat5, 6 Author Orcid Image ;   Kholoud Al-Mahzoum1 Author Orcid Image ;   Ala'a B Al-Tammemi7 Author Orcid Image ;   Diana Malaeb8 Author Orcid Image ;   Rabih Hallit9, 10, 11 Author Orcid Image ;   Souheil Hallit9, 12 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (54) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Sahari Y, Al-Kadi A, Ali J. A Cross Sectional Study of ChatGPT in Translation: Magnitude of Use, Attitudes, and Uncertainties. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2023;52(6):2937 View
  2. Veras M, Dyer J, Rooney M, Barros Silva P, Rutherford D, Kairy D. Usability and Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots (ChatGPT) for Health Sciences Students: Protocol for a Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Research Protocols 2023;12:e51873 View
  3. Sallam M, Barakat M, Sallam M. Pilot Testing of a Tool to Standardize the Assessment of the Quality of Health Information Generated by Artificial Intelligence-Based Models. Cureus 2023 View
  4. Gulati A, Saini H, Singh S, Kumar V. “ENHANCING LEARNING POTENTIAL: INVESTIGATING MARKETING STUDENTS’ BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS TO ADOPT CHATGPT”. Marketing Education Review 2024;34(3):201 View
  5. Weidener L, Fischer M. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study Among Medical Students on Application, Education, and Ethical Aspects. JMIR Medical Education 2024;10:e51247 View
  6. Gupta V, Yang H. Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Technology Adoption Model for Entrepreneurs: Case of ChatGPT. Internet Reference Services Quarterly 2024;28(2):223 View
  7. Abdaljaleel M, Barakat M, Alsanafi M, Salim N, Abazid H, Malaeb D, Mohammed A, Hassan B, Wayyes A, Farhan S, Khatib S, Rahal M, Sahban A, Abdelaziz D, Mansour N, AlZayer R, Khalil R, Fekih-Romdhane F, Hallit R, Hallit S, Sallam M. A multinational study on the factors influencing university students’ attitudes and usage of ChatGPT. Scientific Reports 2024;14(1) View
  8. George Pallivathukal R, Kyaw Soe H, Donald P, Samson R, Hj Ismail A. ChatGPT for Academic Purposes: Survey Among Undergraduate Healthcare Students in Malaysia. Cureus 2024 View
  9. Shorey S, Mattar C, Pereira T, Choolani M. A scoping review of ChatGPT's role in healthcare education and research. Nurse Education Today 2024;135:106121 View
  10. Gupta V, Yang H, Haldorai A. Study protocol for factors influencing the adoption of ChatGPT technology by startups: Perceptions and attitudes of entrepreneurs. PLOS ONE 2024;19(2):e0298427 View
  11. Alshammari S, Alshammari M. Factors Affecting the Adoption and Use of ChatGPT in Higher Education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education 2024;20(1):1 View
  12. Belaldavar C, Angadi P. Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Use of Chat GPT In Dentistry Among Dental Students and Dental Professionals. Annals of Dental Specialty 2024;12(1):14 View
  13. Gupta V. An Empirical Evaluation of a Generative Artificial Intelligence Technology Adoption Model from Entrepreneurs’ Perspectives. Systems 2024;12(3):103 View
  14. Wang Z, Wang Z, Deng R. Assessment Scale and Behavioral Model Construction for AI Chat Information Retrieval and Processing Service Systems Based on Behavioral Reasoning Theory—Taking ChatGPT-Like Tools as an Example. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 2024:1 View
  15. Zhang Y, Yang X, Tong W. University Students’ Attitudes Toward ChatGPT Profiles and Their Relation to ChatGPT Intentions. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 2024:1 View
  16. Dahri N, Yahaya N, Al-Rahmi W, Aldraiweesh A, Alturki U, Almutairy S, Shutaleva A, Soomro R. Extended TAM based acceptance of AI-Powered ChatGPT for supporting metacognitive self-regulated learning in education: A mixed-methods study. Heliyon 2024;10(8):e29317 View
  17. Savellon M, Baybayan S, Asiri M. Learning satisfaction on the use of chatgpt among nursing students in selected higher education institutions in Sulu. Journal of Education and Academic Settings 2024;1(1):1 View
  18. Xing J, Jiang Q. Factors influencing user experience in AI chat systems – a satisfaction study based on factor analysis and linear regression. Kybernetes 2024 View
  19. Xu Z, Fang Q, Huang Y, Xie M, Yadav J. The public attitude towards ChatGPT on reddit: A study based on unsupervised learning from sentiment analysis and topic modeling. PLOS ONE 2024;19(5):e0302502 View
  20. de Winter J, Dodou D, Eisma Y. Personality and acceptance as predictors of ChatGPT use. Discover Psychology 2024;4(1) View
  21. Almogren A, Al-Rahmi W, Dahri N. Exploring factors influencing the acceptance of ChatGPT in higher education: A smart education perspective. Heliyon 2024;10(11):e31887 View
  22. Kıyak Y, Emekli E. ChatGPT prompts for generating multiple-choice questions in medical education and evidence on their validity: a literature review. Postgraduate Medical Journal 2024;100(1189):858 View
  23. Shen X, Mo X, Xia T. Exploring the attitude and use of GenAI-image among art and design college students based on TAM and SDT. Interactive Learning Environments 2024:1 View
  24. Peláez-Sánchez I, Velarde-Camaqui D, Glasserman-Morales L. The impact of large language models on higher education: exploring the connection between AI and Education 4.0. Frontiers in Education 2024;9 View
  25. Wijaya T, Su M, Cao Y, Weinhandl R, Houghton T. Examining Chinese preservice mathematics teachers’ adoption of AI chatbots for learning: Unpacking perspectives through the UTAUT2 model. Education and Information Technologies 2024 View
  26. Ofem U, Owan V, Iyam M, Udeh M, Anake P, Ovat S. Students’ perceptions, attitudes and utilisation of ChatGPT for academic dishonesty: Multigroup analyses via PLS‒SEM. Education and Information Technologies 2024 View
  27. Gammoh L. ChatGPT in academia: exploring university students’ risks, misuses, and challenges in Jordan. Journal of Further and Higher Education 2024;48(6):608 View
  28. Lin H, Liao L, Wang Y, Chang L. Attitude and utilization of ChatGPT among registered nurses: A cross‐sectional study. International Nursing Review 2024 View
  29. Zhang J, Yoon C, Williams D, Pinkas A. Exploring the Usage of ChatGPT Among Medical Students in the United States. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development 2024;11 View
  30. Molena K, Macedo A, Ijaz A, Carvalho F, Gallo M, Wanderley Garcia de Paula e Silva F, de Rossi A, Mezzomo L, Mugayar L, Queiroz A. Assessing the Accuracy, Completeness, and Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Responses in Dentistry: A Pilot Study Evaluating the ChatGPT Model. Cureus 2024 View
  31. Sallam M, Al-Mahzoum K, Alshuaib O, Alhajri H, Alotaibi F, Alkhurainej D, Al-Balwah M, Barakat M, Egger J. Language discrepancies in the performance of generative artificial intelligence models: an examination of infectious disease queries in English and Arabic. BMC Infectious Diseases 2024;24(1) View
  32. Yusuf A, Pervin N, Román‐González M, Noor N. Generative AI in education and research: A systematic mapping review. Review of Education 2024;12(2) View
  33. Abdelwahed N. Recognizing the Role of ChatGPT in Decision-Making and Recognition of Mental Health Disorders among Entrepreneurs. OBM Neurobiology 2024;08(03):1 View
  34. Gammoh L. ChatGPT risks in academia: Examining university educators’ challenges in Jordan. Education and Information Technologies 2024 View
  35. Bukar U, Sayeed M, Razak S, Yogarayan S, Sneesl R. Prioritizing Ethical Conundrums in the Utilization of ChatGPT in Education through an Analytical Hierarchical Approach. Education Sciences 2024;14(9):959 View
  36. Chen S, Kuo H, Chang S. Perceptions of ChatGPT in healthcare: usefulness, trust, and risk. Frontiers in Public Health 2024;12 View
  37. Sallam M, Al-Salahat K, Eid H, Egger J, Puladi B. Human versus Artificial Intelligence: ChatGPT-4 Outperforming Bing, Bard, ChatGPT-3.5 and Humans in Clinical Chemistry Multiple-Choice Questions. Advances in Medical Education and Practice 2024;Volume 15:857 View
  38. Al-Abdullatif A, Alsubaie M. ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy. Behavioral Sciences 2024;14(9):845 View
  39. Nemt-allah M, Khalifa W, Badawy M, Elbably Y, Ibrahim A. Validating the ChatGPT Usage Scale: psychometric properties and factor structures among postgraduate students. BMC Psychology 2024;12(1) View
  40. Iliyasu Z, Abdullahi H, Iliyasu B, Bashir H, Amole T, Abdullahi H, Abdullahi A, Kwaku A, Dahir T, Tsiga-Ahmed F, Jibo A, Salihu H, Aliyu M. Correlates of Medical and Allied Health Students’ Engagement with Generative AI in Nigeria. Medical Science Educator 2024 View
  41. Aminifard M, Makizadeh V, Ahmadi Kahnali R, Nekooeezadeh M. ChatGPT Adoption in Marketing: Exploring Drivers and Barriers through Behavioral Reasoning Theory. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 2024:1 View
  42. Sallam M, Al-Mahzoum K, Almutairi Y, Alaqeel O, Abu Salami A, Almutairi Z, Alsarraf A, Barakat M. Anxiety among Medical Students Regarding Generative Artificial Intelligence Models: A Pilot Descriptive Study. International Medical Education 2024;3(4):406 View
  43. Chang L, Wang Y, Lin H, Liao L. Registered Nurses' Attitudes Towards ChatGPT and Self‐Directed Learning: A Cross‐Sectional Study. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2024 View
  44. Acosta-Enriquez B, Arbulú Pérez Vargas C, Huamaní Jordan O, Arbulú Ballesteros M, Paredes Morales A. Exploring attitudes toward ChatGPT among college students: An empirical analysis of cognitive, affective, and behavioral components using path analysis. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 2024;7:100320 View
  45. Monib W, Qazi A, Mahmud M. Exploring learners’ experiences and perceptions of ChatGPT as a learning tool in higher education. Education and Information Technologies 2024 View
  46. Sallam M, Elsayed W, Al-Shorbagy M, Barakat M, El Khatib S, Ghach W, Alwan N, Hallit S, Malaeb D. ChatGPT usage and attitudes are driven by perceptions of usefulness, ease of use, risks, and psycho-social impact: a study among university students in the UAE. Frontiers in Education 2024;9 View
  47. Amin M, Kim Y, Noh M. Unveiling the drivers of ChatGPT utilization in higher education sectors: the direct role of perceived knowledge and the mediating role of trust in ChatGPT. Education and Information Technologies 2024 View
  48. Liu F, Chang X, Zhu Q, Huang Y, Li Y, Wang H. Assessing clinical medicine students’ acceptance of large language model: based on technology acceptance model. BMC Medical Education 2024;24(1) View
  49. Richter S, Giroux M, Piven I, Sima H, Dodd P. A Constructivist Approach to Integrating AI in Marketing Education: Bridging Theory and Practice. Journal of Marketing Education 2024 View
  50. Wang Y, Wang H. Mediating effects of artificial intelligence on the relationship between academic engagement and mental health among Chinese college students. Frontiers in Psychology 2024;15 View
  51. Aster A, Laupichler M, Rockwell-Kollmann T, Masala G, Bala E, Raupach T. ChatGPT and Other Large Language Models in Medical Education — Scoping Literature Review. Medical Science Educator 2024 View
  52. Chaiban T, Nahle Z, Assi G, Cherfane M. The intent of ChatGPT usage and its robustness in medical proficiency exams: a systematic review. Discover Education 2024;3(1) View