This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Corrigenda and Addenda (3)

Published on in Vol 10 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/57594, first published .
Correction: How Does ChatGPT Perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE)? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment

Correction: How Does ChatGPT Perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE)? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment

Correction: How Does ChatGPT Perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE)? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment

Authors of this article:

Aidan Gilson1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Conrad W Safranek1 Author Orcid Image ;   Thomas Huang2 Author Orcid Image ;   Vimig Socrates1, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Ling Chi1 Author Orcid Image ;   Richard Andrew Taylor1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   David Chartash1, 4 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (21) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Kerci S, Sahan B. An Analysis of ChatGPT4 to Respond to Glaucoma-Related Questions. Journal of Glaucoma 2024;33(7):486 View
  2. Rodrigues Alessi M, Gomes H, Lopes de Castro M, Terumy Okamoto C. Performance of ChatGPT in Solving Questions From the Progress Test (Brazilian National Medical Exam): A Potential Artificial Intelligence Tool in Medical Practice. Cureus 2024 View
  3. Gencer G, Gencer K. A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Medical Faculty Graduates in Medical Specialization Exams: Uncovering the Potential of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education. Cureus 2024 View
  4. Ajit-Roger E, Semsar Kazerooni K, Savage J, Nguyen L. Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Performance on the Canadian Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery In-Training Exam: Insights from an Experimental Comparative Analysis (Preprint). JMIR Medical Education 2024 View
  5. Günay-polatkan Ş, Sığırlı D. A Comparative Analysis of GPT-3.5, GPT-4 and GPT-4.o in Heart Failure. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2025;50(3):443 View
  6. Abdelhafiz A, Farghly M, Sultan E, Abouelmagd M, Ashmawy Y, Elsebaie E. Medical students and ChatGPT: analyzing attitudes, practices, and academic perceptions. BMC Medical Education 2025;25(1) View
  7. Bolgova O, Shypilova I, Mavrych V. Large Language Models in Biochemistry Education: Comparative Evaluation of Performance. JMIR Medical Education 2025;11:e67244 View
  8. Goglia M, Cicolani A, Carrano F, Petrucciani N, D’Angelo F, Pace M, Chiarini L, Silecchia G, Aurello P. Using Large Language Models in the Diagnosis of Acute Cholecystitis: Assessing Accuracy and Guidelines Compliance. The American Surgeon™ 2025;91(6):967 View
  9. Chokkakula S, Chong S, Yang B, Jiang H, Yu J, Han R, Attitalla I, Yin C, Zhang S. Quantum leap in medical mentorship: exploring ChatGPT’s transition from textbooks to terabytes. Frontiers in Medicine 2025;12 View
  10. Chuang W, Kao Y, Liu Y, Lee C. Assessing ChatGPT for Clinical Decision-Making in Radiation Oncology, With Open-Ended Questions and Images. Practical Radiation Oncology 2025;15(5):e412 View
  11. Bucak Ö, Cinar C. Artificial Intelligence as a Partner in Ankylosing Spondylitis Care: Evaluating ChatGPT’s Role and Performance. Medical Records 2025;7(2):339 View
  12. Özer Aslan İ, Aslan M. Benchmarking AI Chatbots for Maternal Lactation Support: A Cross-Platform Evaluation of Quality, Readability, and Clinical Accuracy. Healthcare 2025;13(14):1756 View
  13. Bolgova O, Ganguly P, Ikram M, Mavrych V. Evaluating large language models as graders of medical short answer questions: a comparative analysis with expert human graders. Medical Education Online 2025;30(1) View
  14. Wang H, Bai X, Cui X, Chen G, Fan G, Wei G, Zheng Y, Wu J, Gao S. Symptom Recognition in Medical Conversations Via multi- Instance Learning and Prompt. Journal of Medical Systems 2025;49(1) View
  15. Han J, Yang Y, Liu G. Are Teachers Assessing Work Written by Students or by AI? A Rapid Literature Review of Research on Detecting Content Generated by Generative AI. European Journal of Education 2025;60(4) View
  16. Stueker E, Kolbinger F, Saldanha O, Digomann D, Pistorius S, Oehme F, Van Treeck M, Ferber D, Löffler C, Weitz J, Distler M, Kather J, Muti H. Vision-language models for automated video analysis and documentation in laparoscopic surgery: a proof-of-concept study. International Journal of Surgery 2025;111(11):7777 View
  17. Ajit-Roger E, Kazerooni K, Savage J, Nguyen L. Performance of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot on the Canadian Otolaryngology in-Training Exam: Unlocking Insights on the Intersection of Technology and Education. Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery 2025;54 View
  18. Koyuncuoglu C, Selcuker A, Ozyilmaz E. The reliability of answers from four different AI chatbots on periodontology theoretical exam questions: an evaluation in dental education. BMC Oral Health 2025 View
  19. Kültüroğlu G, Özgüner Y, Altınsoy S, Kına S, Erdem Hıdıroğlu E, Ergil J. Can Artificial Intelligence Be Successful as an Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Resident?. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation 2025 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Freeburg T, Chang T. Digital Health, AI and Generative AI in Healthcare. View

Conference Proceedings

  1. Hammond E, Faber C. 2024 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). Work in Progress: Integration of AI Tools on an Open-Ended Computer Programming Project View