Published on in Vol 9 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/44084, first published .
Scoring Single-Response Multiple-Choice Items: Scoping Review and Comparison of Different Scoring Methods

Scoring Single-Response Multiple-Choice Items: Scoping Review and Comparison of Different Scoring Methods

Scoring Single-Response Multiple-Choice Items: Scoping Review and Comparison of Different Scoring Methods

Journals

  1. Su M, Lin L, Lin L, Chen Y. Assessing question characteristic influences on ChatGPT's performance and response-explanation consistency: Insights from Taiwan's Nursing Licensing Exam. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2024;153:104717 View
  2. Rezigalla A, Eleragi A, Elhussein A, Alfaifi J, ALGhamdi M, Al Ameer A, Yahia A, Mohammed O, Adam M. Item analysis: the impact of distractor efficiency on the difficulty index and discrimination power of multiple-choice items. BMC Medical Education 2024;24(1) View
  3. Rössler L, Herrmann M, Wiegand A, Kanzow P. Use of Multiple-Choice Items in Summative Examinations: Questionnaire Survey Among German Undergraduate Dental Training Programs. JMIR Medical Education 2024;10:e58126 View
  4. Kollster A, Cyris M, Conrad J, Mekhemar M, Dörfer C, Graetz C. Applying Progress Testing to Undergraduate Periodontal Courses—A First Evaluation After 2 Years of Use in a German University. European Journal of Dental Education 2025 View
  5. Stokstad J, Nedrehagen E, Hufthammer K. The Jigsaw teaching method compared to traditional teaching on anatomy and physiology knowledge in higher education – a randomised controlled trial. BMC Medical Education 2026 View
  6. Khullar S, Morya A, Aggarwal S, Gupta T, Priyanka P, Morya R. Ocular health in outer space and beyond gravity: A minireview. World Journal of Clinical Cases 2026;14(3) View