This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Reviews in Medical Education (54) Testing and Assessment in Medical Education (40) Research Instruments, Questionnaires, and Tools (545) Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools (439)

Published on in Vol 9 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/44084, first published .
Scoring Single-Response Multiple-Choice Items: Scoping Review and Comparison of Different Scoring Methods

Scoring Single-Response Multiple-Choice Items: Scoping Review and Comparison of Different Scoring Methods

Scoring Single-Response Multiple-Choice Items: Scoping Review and Comparison of Different Scoring Methods

Authors of this article:

Amelie Friederike Kanzow1 Author Orcid Image ;   Dennis Schmidt2 Author Orcid Image ;   Philipp Kanzow2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (3) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Su M, Lin L, Lin L, Chen Y. Assessing question characteristic influences on ChatGPT's performance and response-explanation consistency: Insights from Taiwan's Nursing Licensing Exam. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2024;153:104717 View
  2. Rezigalla A, Eleragi A, Elhussein A, Alfaifi J, ALGhamdi M, Al Ameer A, Yahia A, Mohammed O, Adam M. Item analysis: the impact of distractor efficiency on the difficulty index and discrimination power of multiple-choice items. BMC Medical Education 2024;24(1) View
  3. Rössler L, Herrmann M, Wiegand A, Kanzow P. Use of Multiple-Choice Items in Summative Examinations: Questionnaire Survey Among German Undergraduate Dental Training Programs. JMIR Medical Education 2024;10:e58126 View