Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Monday, March 11, 2019 at 4:00 PM to 4:30 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Advertisement

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 08.11.19 in Vol 5, No 2 (2019): Jul-Dec

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at http://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/13795, first published Feb 22, 2019.

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

    Original Paper

    Students' Experiences of Seeking Web-Based Animal Health Information at the Ontario Veterinary College: Exploratory Qualitative Study

    Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada

    *these authors contributed equally

    Corresponding Author:

    Nanette Lai, BSc, BA, MA

    Department of Population Medicine

    Ontario Veterinary College

    University of Guelph

    50 Stone Road East

    Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1

    Canada

    Phone: 1 519 824 4120 ext 54089

    Email: lain@uoguelph.ca


    ABSTRACT

    Background: Although searching for health information on the internet has offered clear benefits of rapid access to information for seekers such as patients, medical practitioners, and students, detrimental effects on seekers’ experiences have also been documented. Health information overload is one such side effect, where an information seeker receives excessive volumes of potentially useful health-related messages that cannot be processed in a timely manner. This phenomenon has been documented among medical professionals, with consequences that include impacts on patient care. Presently, the use of the internet for health-related information, and particularly animal health information, in veterinary students has received far less research attention.

    Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore veterinary students’ internet search experiences to understand how students perceived the nature of Web-based information and how these perceptions influence their information management.

    Methods: For this qualitative exploratory study, 5 separate focus groups and a single interview were conducted between June and October 2016 with a sample of 21 veterinary students in Ontario, Canada.

    Results: Thematic analysis of focus group transcripts demonstrated one overarching theme, The Overwhelming Nature of the Internet, depicted by two subthemes: Volume and Type of Web-based Health Information and Processing, Managing, and Evaluating Information.

    Conclusions: Integrating electronic health information literacy training into human health sciences students’ training has shown to have positive effects on information management skills. Given a recent Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges report that considers health literacy as a professional competency, results of this study point to a direction for future research and for institutions to contemplate integrating information literacy skills in veterinary curricula. Specifically, we propose that the information literacy skills should include knowledge about access, retrieval, evaluation, and timely application of Web-based information.

    JMIR Med Educ 2019;5(2):e13795

    doi:10.2196/13795

    KEYWORDS



    Introduction

    Seeking Health Information on the Internet

    The phenomenon of health care consumers searching for health or medical information on the internet has been widely documented in the academic literature [1-3]. Furthermore, students enrolled in health care programs (eg, medicine, nursing, and dentistry) have been investigated extensively and are reported to use the internet for health-related information [4-6], for supporting their learning in junior years [7], and to help with their understanding of content during senior clinical years [8]. Presently, the use of the internet for health-related information, and particularly animal health information, in veterinary students has received far less research attention [9]. As a recent report from the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges (AAVMC) considers health literacy a professional competency [10], exploring students’ internet search experiences for animal health information may offer deeper insight about students’ digital health literacy.

    Health Information Overload

    Although searching for health information on the internet has offered clear benefits of rapid access to information for seekers such as patients [11], medical practitioners [12], and medical students [13], detrimental effects on seekers’ experiences have also been documented [14]. One example of a negative outcome associated with Web-based health information seeking is so-called cyberchondria [15,16], where Web-based information seekers are reported to become overly concerned and anxious about their health signs and symptoms, and subsequently experience health information overload (HIO) [17-19].

    Information overload (IO) involves having “access to more useful information than can be processed in a useful way” (p. 266) [20]. Similarly, HIO describes the phenomenon that occurs when an individual receives excessive amount of health-related messages such that potentially useful content becomes a burden rather than beneficial to the recipient [21]. Some researchers suggest that the internet is a major contributor to HIO in today’s society [14] with implications of potentially undesirable outcomes for information seekers [22]. For example, information seekers with HIO may develop a long-term unwillingness to seek information online, feel reluctant to further develop Web-based information search skills [23], or develop psychological effects such as anxiety [24,25].

    Multiple studies suggest that HIO may be related to seeker health information literacy (HIL) [21,26]. HIL is defined as the degree to which individuals can obtain, process, understand, and communicate about health-related information needed to make informed health decisions [18,27]. HIL pertaining to health content delivered by means of the internet is termed electronic health information literacy (EHIL) [28,29]. Research suggests that academic institutions include EHIL training within their health care programs to address HIO potentiated by the internet [30].

    HIO has been documented among human health care professionals [30,31], with potential impacts on patient care [32]. For example, Singh et al [33] reported physicians missing or overlooking patient test results as a consequence of being overloaded by a continual stream of information from internet-based electronic health records (EHRs). EHRs contain vast amount of medical content about individuals or populations, retrievable to stakeholders such as medical patients and providers [34]. The internet also contains other types of digital medical content accessible to health care professionals that are often used for training and educational purposes. Some researchers argue that students training in health care professions are also at risk of HIO [35]. Further supporting this concern are results from a survey of medical students [36], where 91% of the 100 respondents reported feeling overloaded by medical information. In addition, the same surveyed students indicated that they felt medical IO caused over 80% of their stress.

    Stress among medical students has been well documented [37]. Similarly, stress, mental health, wellness, and their respective relationships to student life among veterinary students have also received research attention [38-43]. One qualitative study reported that upper-year Australian veterinary students’ primary source of stress came from IO [41], although information from the internet was not explicitly mentioned. Given that veterinary students today have ready access to the internet for animal health information [44], similar to their medical counterparts, veterinary students may also be at risk of HIO. Previous research shows that vast volumes of information may be a predisposing factor to HIO for postsecondary students with internet access [45] and potentially for veterinary students who reported searching for content using Google to support their studies [44]. Further research indicates that some veterinary students report their training as a chronic stressor [38], which Laakonen and Nevgi [39] suggest may arise from academic demands such as the overwhelming volumes of information students are expected to learn and assimilate. Moreover, HIO may negatively impact student learning as some researchers speculate IO reduces learners’ ability to process information, especially at a deep level [46].

    To understand the effects of using Web-based health information, and the potential for HIO, one must first understand students’ experiences. The purpose of this study was to explore veterinary students’ Web-based animal health information search experiences. Specifically, we wanted to investigate how students perceived the nature of information generated from internet searches and how these perceptions influence students’ management of Web-based information.


    Methods

    Study Design and Participants

    This exploratory qualitative study involved a series of 6 interviews with students enrolled in the 4-year Doctor of Veterinary Medicine program at the Ontario Veterinary College in Guelph, Ontario, Canada. All focus groups were conducted between July and September 2016. The study protocol was approved by the University of Guelph Research Ethics Board (REB #016AP002).

    A total of 21 students were interviewed in 5 separate focus groups and a single individual interview. The mean number of participants for each focus group was 4 (range 3-5). Each focus group discussion ranged from 60 to 90 min. Students’ ages ranged from 21 to 34 years (median=23 years); 20 (95.2%) were female. At the time of data collection, participating students were enrolled in years 1 to 4 of the Doctor of Veterinary Medicine program.

    Recruitment

    All student participants were recruited using an electronic mail listserv, physical posters displayed on bulletin boards located within school buildings, and snowball sampling. Snowball sampling involved requesting students to recommend peers or acquaintances who may also qualify for participation [47]. Students were informed of the study purpose and format and were offered an honorarium ($10 CAD gift card) and meal for participating. All participants were informed as to the risks, benefits, and repercussions of their involvement in the study, and accordingly consented to their involvement before the start of each focus group discussion.

    Data Collection

    At the students’ convenience, interviews took place at the Ontario Veterinary College and followed a semistructured question guide (Multimedia Appendix 1) developed by the first and second authors to discuss the topics of: most recent internet searches for animal health information; internet resources accessed for investigating animal health information; challenges experienced when searching for animal health information on the internet; methods used by students for evaluating quality and validity of internet-based animal health information; and opinions about animal health information on the internet. Focus group questions were open-ended and designed to stimulate discourse among students. Before data collection, the question guide had been assessed using a pilot focus group consisting of a convenience sample of 3 graduate students at the University of Guelph.

    Discussions between participants allowed the moderator (first author) to explore a range of perspectives and shared practices among students involving Web-based searches for animal health information. Data saturation [48] was achieved by the 6th interview as few insights emerge beyond 20 participants [49].

    Field notes documenting observations and nonverbal behaviors were taken by the moderator during all focus group discussions. All discussions were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and deidentified to ensure that transcribed material could not be linked to individuals. Individual speakers were identified as S####. The prefix S indicates the speaker was a student, and #### consists of a unique number assigned to the student. Participants completed a short demographic questionnaire post interview to collect data on gender and age to describe the study population.

    Data Analysis

    All transcripts were systematically checked against the audio recordings for accuracy of representation by the first author. The computer software QSR NVivo 11 was used to facilitate organization of transcripts for thematic analysis [50]. In brief, each transcript was read multiple times to facilitate familiarization of the data, and open codes were applied to sections of text illustrating common ideas across different student focus groups. Common codes occurring across groups were then organized into themes and subthemes and described in a codebook (Multimedia Appendix 2). The themes were then systematically reviewed, named, and defined. For consistency and clarity, naming and defining themes and subthemes were reviewed and cross-checked with codes by the second author. Any inconsistencies were discussed and resolved between the first and second authors. The third and fourth authors were responsible for approving the themes finalized by the first and second authors. Demographic data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (eg, means, median, and proportions) using Microsoft Excel.


    Results

    Theme: The Overwhelming Nature of the Internet

    Subtheme: Volume and Type of Web-Based Health Information

    A general perspective shared by students about seeking animal health information on the internet pertained to the volume of content they had encountered from past searches:

    There’s just too much (information) out there.
    [S1453]

    Another student declared:

    If I’m looking I sometimes get overwhelmed by the amount of information that is out there.
    [S1660]

    The students’ views about the overwhelming nature of animal health information online appeared to be related to the students’ search behaviors such as why they needed information.

    Seeking Companion Animal Health Information

    Expectedly, students searched on the internet because of concerns or questions about their personal companion animals’ health. These experiences reflect the students’ comments about being overwhelmed by large quantities of animal health information on the internet, as depicted by one participant:

    [My search results] would list a whole bunch of symptoms that overlap with so many things. So, then you’re like my pet has this, and this, and this because everything kind of overlaps...so you’re not actually sure.
    [S1350]

    This statement also illuminated that amassing large volumes of content from the internet may confuse students.

    Building Background Knowledge

    Another reason driving students to the internet involved searching for foundational knowledge requiring exploration or understanding:

    It’s a quick way to have a bit of a reference guide, or just background information on a topic that you’ve got no clue about.
    [S1658]

    Despite the speed with which foundational information could be retrieved, students agreed this increased the volume of content they needed to manage. This was best exemplified by one student’s comments:

    Sometimes when we’re learning these new things...I don’t think it’s beneficial having all the resources...because there is so much more behind it that maybe we don’t understand...we have an end point but there’s so much back research behind it that you...need to know to understand and be able to explain the disease and why it happens. But you don’t have enough time to approach that.
    [S1245]

    This comment accentuated the problem of the internet facilitating students’ roundabout research efforts in navigating vast amounts of information because they felt that they need to know to understand. Similar to road traffic travelling through a circular intersection, students appeared to meander continuously in circles on the internet. These roundabout searches began with students gathering information to enhance their understanding, but the information collected also contained other ideas students were unfamiliar with. In attempting to clarify these other ideas, the students would then search for additional information. Ultimately, the students appeared to find themselves in a continuous research cycle that seemed to carry on infinitely, best described by one student:

    It’s...an endless black hole of information that you can find out there.
    [S1660]

    Another student reported experiencing similar difficulties which began from being unable to recall the exact terminology depicting the desired information, owing to the limitations of previous knowledge:

    You can’t find the original thing that the teachers threw out in class and you’re like I really want this...but you don’t remember how to write it and you look it up...and you can’t find anything that helps support what you’re trying to find.
    [S1244]
    Searching for Veterinary Information via Google

    How students searched for information appeared to contribute to the students’ perceptions about large quantities of Web-based contents being overwhelming. In particular, almost all participants referenced using the Google search engine:

    I’ll admit I started with a Google search on (a subject) and then weeded through the websites I thought seemed more legitimate.
    [S0628]

    Google searches also occurred within more specific settings such as during classes:

    If...a professor says a word you don’t understand you can quickly Google the definition.
    [S1660]

    However, students quickly recognized multiple undesired consequence of searching on Google while attending lectures, as depicted by the following account:

    I found so many really deep histo(logy) things...that doesn’t help. I found things that were basically just what (the professor) said on the slide and that doesn’t help either. I know the part I want is one step further but not five steps further... I couldn’t find something that was in-between to my own understanding.
    [S1352]

    As this participant’s words indicate, students were not only concerned about the volume of information Google may retrieve from the internet but were also encountering challenges in finding relevant information that correlated with what they required to enhance their understanding of a subject. However, students often found content appearing to contain levels of detail beyond what was needed for their stage of understanding.

    Similarly, students recognized an undesired consequence of using Google to retrieve information:

    [I] have a hard time narrowing down what you actually need to know and learn at this point.
    [S1660]

    Another participant shared a related belief, expressing the desire:

    To know how to limit down the search to find exactly what you want.
    [S1244]

    Students clearly expressed a sense of being overwhelmed by the quantity of information generated by a Google search, and also shared experiences of frustration because the volumes of information generated was deemed irrelevant to their needs.

    Beyond the Google search engine, students offered reasons as to why they may feel overwhelmed by the volume of information generated by a Web-based search, for example:

    I think just some part of human nature...if you have a question you want the answer. And you don’t necessarily always want to sift through details.
    [S1661]

    Correspondingly, students unanimously expressed the desire to get immediate answers in a simple form rather than having to dig deeper through large volumes of detailed information.

    Subtheme: Processing, Managing, and Evaluating Information

    Related to students’ descriptions and efforts of acquiring large volumes of information, students across focus groups appeared weary when describing the need to further process their search results. One student specified that textual Web-based information presented personal challenges for the following reason:

    I can only seriously read for so long and it’s just too much.
    [S1246]

    Similarly, a fellow student stated the following:

    I have a really hard time looking at pages and pages of words.
    [S1661]

    Still another student shared experiences about encountering large volumes of text-based information on the internet, mentioning a specific medium:

    Forums...I don’t like them at all. I try to stay away from forums...the thought for me reading through blog post upon blog post...I find maybe one word that will lead me to something else...just...really tedious. I find that...frustrating.
    [S1245]

    Another aspect students presented about their frustrations with internet content involved managing conflicting information, as demonstrated by one individual describing his search experience:

    I would just go to the search bar, type in...eosinophilic granuloma complex, hit enter and then look at all these message board posts, which you spend hours ciphering through. Some people say treat with this, some people say treat with that. It’s just—it’s frustrating.
    [S1557]

    The apparent frustration expressed by students seemed related to becoming confused by Web-based content, which added another level of cognitive effort. This was depicted by one student’s comments:

    Something like PetMD. Sometimes they can give you potential diagnoses...is this really reliable because it really fits all the symptoms that we were talking about? Or is it that...I’m just getting ahead of myself and it is listing a bunch of other things that it could be, that it really is?
    [S1349]
    Assessing Information Reliability

    The student’s comment indicated that a large part of processing internet content entailed students evaluating information reliability.

    Information processing and evaluation often involved students comparing internet information with their existing knowledge. For example:

    I use my own background knowledge to decide whether...to read through it. And say...this sounds like a good information.
    [S1661]

    Using existing knowledge to compare against information found online appeared to be a common strategy among participants for discerning accuracy and validity of the information, as indicated by another student:

    My roommate and I were finishing up a POD (Principles of Disease) assignment so we were looking up, we’re trying to differentiate between primary and secondary hemostasis and coagulation factors and stuff involved...things like that, where...I’ve learned it, and I have...a little bit of knowledge on it so I can...use that to help me guide whether or not...it’s truthful or not on the Internet.
    [S1453]

    This same student further explained her information assessment strategies:

    It seemed to be the most reliable information just based on what knowledge I have already. It seemed relatively consistent with what we’re learning in therio(genology). And what I know just from past experience.
    [S1453]

    When the moderator asked the same student to describe her process referring to past experiences, the student further elaborated as follows:

    I’ve worked for 4 years in a small animal practice, I volunteered for two years at large animal practices and I volunteered for five years at another small animal practice. Just comparing...cases we’ve seen at work...the outcome of the cases and the treatment protocol... then comparing that to what the forums and the websites would say.
    [S1453]

    Other students spoke about utilizing a similar strategy, where they referred to cases they had encountered in the past for assessing the legitimacy of content or claims presented online.

    Yet, many students declared that they felt unsure about what might be considered trustworthy information, since their typical search results contained what they thought to be reliable information mixed in with what they deemed to be information written based on personal opinions, as depicted by one student’s comments:

    I have found some websites where...I really want to be like “oh wow this is really good information.” And some of the things they have said are so outlandish I’m like “oh this must be written by...somebody who isn’t truly involved in the industry.” And then [the content] has a veterinarian as an author...it’s discouraging.
    [S1661]

    Another student noted that with animal health content on the internet:

    There’s so much information and so much different information. Especially in the vet field there’s a lot of different institutes of thought and not a lot of things agree all the time when you’re trying to get information.
    [S1245]

    These comments highlighted that even within Web-based resources affiliated with the veterinary profession, views presented could differ vastly.

    Handling Conflicting Information

    From the students’ perspective, conflicting ideas presented by multiple internet resources affiliated with the veterinary profession and assumed to be reputable appeared to complicate their attempts at evaluating information quality.

    When discussing information quality and the evaluation criteria students applied, one commonality observed seemed to be the importance students placed on authorship. This was well exemplified by the comments of one student describing her information assessment process:

    Looking at who published it, is it actually a veterinarian, is it just someone with a really strong opinion and a platform using the Internet.
    [S1549]

    Related to skepticism about authorship, students discussed taking into account the format in which the veterinary messages are presented when evaluating information. In particular, students described blogs as less reliable sources for information:

    I try to avoid blogs, and that kind of stuff and try to find sources like some veterinary hospitals have a lot of great resources online...government web pages. Things like that, I try to stick with if I'm actually looking for valid information.
    [S1660]

    Accentuating the apparent caution students applied when reading blogs, some students expressed a belief that authors of blogs may be writing to publish opinions, as depicted by one participant:

    A lot of blogs and websites where they write for the sake of an outlet.
    [S1658]

    However, one student would consider blogs as an information source depending on authorship, stating the following:

    I know there’s some blogs that are written by veterinarians...So if it’s written by someone who seems credible, who has the educational background...it’d be more credible. And is information I’d feel more comfortable trusting.
    [S1660]

    Overall, students appeared to consider authorship and whether the author may be a veterinarian, as depicted by one participant:

    There are a few websites where I know the veterinarians personally that publish onto them...So if I can I try to look for them because I know a little bit more about that veterinarian.
    [S1551]

    Elaborating on authors being veterinarians, nearly all students’ information evaluation criteria involved examining authors’ credentials:

    The first thing I do before reading...is look at the author’s signature...‘Cause it’ll say oh, Dr. ______ and it’ll say board-certified veterinary dermatologist. I see that and I’m like okay, whatever he says is probably more weighty than someone else’s comment.
    [S1557]

    One student acknowledged the following with animal health information on the internet:

    You can’t just take everything you read for granted. You have to...take it with a grain of salt.
    [S1661]

    Discussion

    Principal Findings

    Findings of this study offer an understanding of veterinary students’ perceptions about the nature of Web-based animal health information, and how their search experiences may impact the way in which that information is managed. Students in this study clearly indicated that they were overwhelmed by the volume of Web-based animal health information. These findings are consistent with studies of students in human health sciences programs being inundated by increasing amounts of health-related content from the internet [51,52]. The apparent staggering effect from searching the internet for animal health information appears to stem from the students’ search strategies, specifically search engine use. Using search engines for seeking health information produces massive volumes of content for seekers, with 38% in one study reporting feeling overwhelmed as a result [53]. In another study, search engine use for seeking health content among college students found that 19% felt overwhelmed by the search results [54]. Consistent with findings from this study, primarily turning to Google for health content quickly produces unmanageable quantities of information [16,55,56].

    Feeling swamped by search engine results may be linked to the students’ frustration and emotional responses to seeking Web-based health information. According to Spink et al [57], “Internet users are often frustrated and emotional during their Web search engine interactions. They wish to engage in an advice-seeking interaction, but may be frustrated by the inability of the system to respond to their personal medical and health needs and concerns for health information” (p. 49). Similarly, veterinary students may experience feelings of frustration from using search engines because these tools may not give precise responses to students’ specific animal health inquiries. In this study, this claim is supported by students’ reports of using search engines during lectures. The circumstance of being in class also highlights the fact that students needed information immediately imposing some degree of urgency, which may contribute to feelings of frustration. During these searches, students entered just 1 or 2 terms into the search engine, generating large volumes of content which did not meet the students’ immediate information needs [58,59]. Understandably, individual students may experience frustration or emotional reactions given the situation—the lecture would be continuing, while the student continued not understanding the materials presented earlier in the same lecture. In addition, the students in this study expressed that they simultaneously tried to manage the information generated from the internet and remain engaged in the ongoing lecture content, causing confusion and potentially increasing that individual’s knowledge gap [60].

    As students accepted into a veterinary medical program have robust records of academic achievement [61], becoming aware of one’s knowledge gaps while being unable to quickly ameliorate the situation may further contribute to an individual student’s experiences of frustration. Research on medical students suggests an association between individual anxiety and concerns about mastering knowledge [62]. Given the similarities between medical and veterinary students such as being elite academic performers [63], the latter group presumptively also experiences concerns toward mastering knowledge. Added to this, anxiety related to concerns about academic performance has been documented in veterinary students [60]. Veterinary students’ learning experience may be enhanced and supported by furthering their HIL skills, such that the students feel more confident in their abilities to retrieve and utilize Web-based information.

    Students in this study voiced frustration at the time and effort it takes to retrieve relevant Web-based health information and made specific mention of their use and reliance on the Web search engine Google. Among the first-year dental students, research indicates that the reliance on Web search engines such as Google indicates lower levels of EHIL [64]. Other studies of veterinary students have suggested the need to integrate EHIL into curricula [9,28,65], such that graduates will possess adequate research skills compliant with accreditation standards 5 and 12 of the American Veterinary Medical Association that will benefit graduates in either research or clinical practice. The results of this study also support facilitation of Web-based HIL skills. Students’ apparent frustration may be ameliorated if they receive more opportunities to use their existing EHIL capabilities, along with receiving feedback from instructors about their information retrieval strategies [65-67].

    Paradoxically, while the students from this study expressed being frustrated, and at times confused in their information retrieval efforts, they discussed in detail their skills in evaluating information reliability. Being skeptical appeared to be a common approach for students when assessing information from the internet, as depicted by mentions of critically appraising Web-based content. Students recognized that their skepticism included questioning their own assumptions about information reliability on the basis of past knowledge, acknowledging that some Web-based research findings may conflict with what they had considered to be pre-existing reliable information. These findings appear consistent with research on fourth- and fifth-year medical students judging medical information from the internet according to their own knowledge, while maintaining awareness of their assumptions about information validity [68].

    Searching for information on the internet appears to facilitate students building multiple layers of knowledge. The students in this study discussed how the internet affords a quick resource for students to conduct searches for basic content to facilitate learning of more advanced materials. Learners acquiring information using Web-based inquiry for achieving higher level knowledge has been termed technology-enhanced scaffolding [69]. From research on teaching methods, scaffolding provides an individual learner with just enough knowledge to make progress on his or her own [69,70]. However, Web-based scaffolding appeared to also initiate veterinary students’ circular research behavior. The circular research behavior identified in this study is consistent with previous research, which reported that information-seeking processes depended on how an individual perceived the tasks he or she needed to complete [71]. As suggested by these findings, a veterinary student may face the task of understanding a novel concept presented during a lecture. The student may perceive this learning task as a problem that could be resolved by collecting information, where information potentially offers a positive change in the student’s knowledge [72]. How the student obtains information to solve the perceived problem depends on his or her previous knowledge, which also determines how complex they view the task at hand. Expectedly, the less previous knowledge the student possesses, task complexity increases as the student first needs to assimilate basic ideas for comprehending the more advanced content or need to know to understand. In turn, this increases how much information the student will need to acquire for accomplishing the original task.

    Implications

    Developing EHIL as part of veterinary curricula may reduce student’s feelings of IO. Having enhanced information skills may allow students to rely less on the Google search engine and potentially conduct more efficient, exhaustive content searches in shorter periods of time. For example, a study by Grant et al [28] involving third-year pharmacy students found statistically significant differences in student search strategy test scores after the students received repeated training in Web-based search methods, where the participants were given both a lecture and demonstration on search strategies. Perhaps having similar EHIL training exercises as part of veterinary curricula will confer similar positive experiences for veterinary students. A protective factor conferred by EHIL training was suggested by Chemers et al [72] in a longitudinal study of college students, where positive effects of student experiences including EHIL training were strongly associated with academic performance and coping perceptions on stress, health, and overall satisfaction and commitment to remain in school. Similarly, EHIL training may help to support veterinary students’ academic experience and potential subsequent positive outcomes on stress levels and learning satisfaction—making this an important consideration for curricula design.

    Ideal curricular design would integrate advancing veterinary students’ knowledge about access, retrieval, evaluation, and practical application of Web-based content on the basis of tasks. Students also appear to need guidance about the depth and breadth of knowledge required of them throughout the training process. Guidance with search strategies may support student learning to distinguish relevant from irrelevant information when conducting Web searches to clarify course materials or new content. Repeated opportunities for students to learn information literacy skills may optimize how these skills become integrated into student cognition. Previous studies of students in professional human health care programs found ongoing training sessions in information literacy over a school year improved information retrieval skills compared with isolated training events such as single workshops during the school year [28].

    Limitations

    Limitations of this study include possible selection bias as there is a chance that students who agreed to be interviewed may have wished to specifically voice that they were less comfortable or proficient in searching for Web-based health information. This study aimed to explore experiences and viewpoints and was not designed for establishing statistical generalizability. Outcomes of this study provide depth of understanding in a previously underexplored phenomena and will be used to guide the development of a quantitative questionnaire for measuring the frequency and distribution of some of the observed phenomena in a larger student population.

    Suggestions for Future Work

    Empirical studies to investigate relationships between veterinary student HIO, stress, and the role of the internet are warranted. Studies of veterinary students in Australia and the United States have reported higher levels of perceived stress in veterinary students compared with the general population [39]. Presently, however, few publications exist specifically investigating a relationship between information literacy and students’ perceived stress levels. More research into this area appears to be a rational next step, and a direction for future research.

    Students’ views and experiences in searching for Web-based pet health information suggest that large volumes of information and the need for evaluation and processing information are 2 aspects that students are negotiating in their efforts to accumulate meaningful content for their learning and understanding. Given a recent AAVMC report considers health literacy as a professional competency [9], future studies may consider investigating student perspectives about HIL. In particular, research focusing on veterinary student confidence and competence toward their existing levels of information literacy may offer an increased understanding about veterinary students’ educational experiences.

    Conclusions

    Veterinary students’ perceived experiences of being overwhelmed after searching the internet for animal health information appears to be a discipline-specific manifestation of HIO. Similar to other health professional students reporting experiences of HIO from internet searches for biomedical content, veterinary students’ HIO may be related to their EHIL skills. The findings of this study point to a need for veterinary curricula designers to consider integrating EHIL skill development throughout study semesters for providing students with strategies to manage information.

    Acknowledgments

    Research costs were supported by the Ontario Veterinary College Pet Trust Fund. The authors thank all the students who agreed to participate in the focus groups.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    Multimedia Appendix 1

    Interview question guide.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 184 KB

    Multimedia Appendix 2

    Thematic analysis code table.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 126 KB

    References

    1. Pang P, Chang S, Pearce J, Verspoor K. Online Health Information Seeking Behaviour: Understanding Different Search Approaches. In: Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. 2014 Presented at: PACIS'14; June 24-28, 2014; Chengdu, China.
    2. Perez SL, Kravitz RL, Bell RA, Chan MS, Paterniti DA. Characterizing internet health information seeking strategies by socioeconomic status: a mixed methods approach. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2016 Aug 9;16:107 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Chu JT, Wang MP, Shen C, Viswanath K, Lam TH, Chan SS. How, when and why people seek health information online: qualitative study in Hong Kong. Interact J Med Res 2017 Dec 12;6(2):e24 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Khamis N, Aljumaiah R, Alhumaid A, Alraheem H, Alkadi D, Koppel C, et al. Undergraduate medical students' perspectives of skills, uses and preferences of information technology in medical education: a cross-sectional study in a Saudi medical college. Med Teach 2018 Sep;40(sup1):S68-S76. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Schleyer TK, Thyvalikakath TP, Spallek H, Dziabiak MP, Johnson LA. From information technology to informatics: the information revolution in dental education. J Dent Educ 2012 Jan;76(1):142-153 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    6. O'Carroll AM, Westby EP, Dooley J, Gordon KE. Information-seeking behaviors of medical students: a cross-sectional web-based survey. JMIR Med Educ 2015 Jun 29;1(1):e4 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Judd T, Kennedy G. Expediency-based practice? Medical students' reliance on Google and Wikipedia for biomedical inquiries. Br J Educ Technol 2011;42(2):351-360. [CrossRef]
    8. Cullen R, Clark M, Esson R. Evidence-based information-seeking skills of junior doctors entering the workforce: an evaluation of the impact of information literacy training during pre-clinical years. Health Info Libr J 2011 Jun;28(2):119-129 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Weiner SA, Stephens G, Nour AY. Information-seeking behaviors of first-semester veterinary students: a preliminary report. J Vet Med Educ 2011;38(1):21-32. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Lane IF, Root Kustritz MV, Schoenfeld-Tacher RM. Veterinary curricula today: curricular management and renewal at AAVMC member institutions. J Vet Med Educ 2017;44(3):381-439. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Tustin N. The role of patient satisfaction in online health information seeking. J Health Commun 2010 Jan;15(1):3-17. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Younger P. Internet-based information-seeking behaviour amongst doctors and nurses: a short review of the literature. Health Info Libr J 2010 Mar;27(1):2-10 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Masic I, Karcic E, Hodzic A, Mulic S. Information technologies in education of medical students at the university of Sarajevo. Acta Inform Med 2014 Aug;22(4):228-231 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Rao P. Wired and worried: understanding users’ emotions while web searching for health information. Procedia Comput Sci 2016;84:132-136. [CrossRef]
    15. Starcevic V, Berle D. Cyberchondria: towards a better understanding of excessive health-related internet use. Expert Rev Neurother 2013 Feb;13(2):205-213. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Starcevic V. Cyberchondria: challenges of problematic online searches for health-related information. Psychother Psychosom 2017;86(3):129-133 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Chae J, Lee CJ, Jensen JD. Correlates of cancer information overload: focusing on individual ability and motivation. Health Commun 2016;31(5):626-634. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Jensen JD, Liu M, Carcioppolo N, John KK, Krakow M, Sun Y. Health information seeking and scanning among US adults aged 50-75 years: testing a key postulate of the information overload model. Health Informatics J 2017 Jun;23(2):96-108. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Lee K, Roehrer E, Cummings E. Information overload in consumers of health-related information: a scoping review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2017 Oct;15(10):2457-2463. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Himma KE. The concept of information overload: a preliminary step in understanding the nature of a harmful information-related condition. Ethics Inf Technol 2007 Sep 20;9(4):259-272. [CrossRef]
    21. Crook B, Stephens KK, Pastorek AE, Mackert M, Donovan EE. Sharing health information and influencing behavioral intentions: the role of health literacy, information overload, and the internet in the diffusion of healthy heart information. Health Commun 2016;31(1):60-71. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. El Sherif R, Pluye P, Thoër C, Rodriguez C. Reducing negative outcomes of online consumer health information: qualitative interpretive study with clinicians, librarians, and consumers. J Med Internet Res 2018 May 4;20(5):e169 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Swar B, Hameed T, Reychav I. Information overload, psychological ill-being, and behavioral intention to continue online healthcare information search. Comput Hum Behav 2017 May;70:416-425. [CrossRef]
    24. Fergus TA, Dolan SL. Problematic internet use and internet searches for medical information: the role of health anxiety. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2014 Dec;17(12):761-765. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Baumgartner SE, Hartmann T. The role of health anxiety in online health information search. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2011 Oct;14(10):613-618. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Kim K, Lustria ML, Burke D, Kwon N. Predictors of cancer information overload: findings from a national survey. Inf Res 2007;12(4):12-14 [FREE Full text]
    27. Berkman ND, Davis TC, McCormack L. Health literacy: what is it? J Health Commun 2010;15(Suppl 2):9-19. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. Grant KL, Herrier RN, Armstrong EP. Teaching a systematic search strategy improves literature retrieval skills of pharmacy students. Am J Pharm Educ 1996;60(3):281-286 [FREE Full text]
    29. Haruna H, Hu X. International trends in designing electronic health information literacy for health sciences students: a systematic review of the literature. J Acad Librariansh 2018 Mar;44(2):300-312. [CrossRef]
    30. Agostino MD, Mejía FM, Martí M, Novillo-Ortiz D, Hazrum F, de Cosío FG. [Infoxication in health. Health information overload on the Internet and the risk of important information becoming invisible]. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2018 Feb 19;41:e115 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    31. Klerings I, Weinhandl AS, Thaler KJ. Information overload in healthcare: too much of a good thing? Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2015;109(4-5):285-290. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    32. Kolusu HR. Scholar Archive. 2015. Information Overload and Its Effect on Healthcare   URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/182f/850caf52a938fe6c25d54d4cc62dc7ca08cd.pdf [accessed 2019-09-20]
    33. Singh H, Spitzmueller C, Petersen NJ, Sawhney MK, Sittig DF. Information overload and missed test results in electronic health record-based settings. JAMA Intern Med 2013 Apr 22;173(8):702-704 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    34. Ambinder EP. Electronic health records. J Oncol Pract 2005 Jul;1(2):57-63 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    35. Dornhorst AC. Information overload: why medical education needs a shake-up. Lancet 1981 Sep 5;2(8245):513-514. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    36. Lahmiti S, Mansouri-Hattab N. The British Medical Journal. 2011. Dealing With the Information Overload: What About Medical Students?   URL: https:/​/www.​bmj.com/​rapid-response/​2011/​11/​03/​dealing-information-overload-what-about-medical-students [accessed 2019-02-05]
    37. Ludwig AB, Burton W, Weingarten J, Milan F, Myers DC, Kligler B. Depression and stress amongst undergraduate medical students. BMC Med Educ 2015 Aug 27;15:141 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    38. Hafen M, Reisbig AM, White MB, Rush BR. The first-year veterinary student and mental health: the role of common stressors. J Vet Med Educ 2008;35(1):102-109. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    39. Laakkonen J, Nevgi A. Relationships between learning strategies, stress, and study success among first-year veterinary students during an educational transition phase. J Vet Med Educ 2014;41(3):284-293. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    40. Killinger SL, Flanagan S, Castine E, Howard KA. Stress and depression among veterinary medical students. J Vet Med Educ 2017;44(1):3-8. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    41. McLennan MW, Sutton RH. Stress in veterinary science students: a study at the University of Queensland. J Vet Med Educ 2005;32(2):213-218. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    42. McArthur M, Mansfield C, Matthew S, Zaki S, Brand C, Andrews J, et al. Resilience in veterinary students and the predictive role of mindfulness and self-compassion. J Vet Med Educ 2017;44(1):106-115. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    43. Cardwell JM, Lewis EG, Smith KC, Holt ER, Baillie S, Allister R, et al. A cross-sectional study of mental health in UK veterinary undergraduates. Vet Rec 2013 Sep 21;173(11):266. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    44. Gledhill L, Dale VH, Powney S, Gaitskell-Phillips GH, Short NR. An international survey of veterinary students to assess their use of online learning resources. J Vet Med Educ 2017;44(4):692-703. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    45. Kurt AA, Emiroglu BG. Analysis of students' online information searching strategies, exposure to internet information pollution and cognitive absorption levels based on various variables. Malaysian Online J Educ Technol 2018;6(1):18-29 [FREE Full text]
    46. Chen CY, Pedersen S, Murphy KL. The influence of perceived information overload on student participation and knowledge construction in computer-mediated communication. Instr Sci 2011 Jul 9;40(2):325-349. [CrossRef]
    47. Robinson OC. Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: a theoretical and practical guide. Qual Res Psychol 2013 Nov 18;11(1):25-41. [CrossRef]
    48. Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant 2018;52(4):1893-1907 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    49. Bautista JR, Lin TT. Nurses' use of mobile instant messaging applications: a uses and gratifications perspective. Int J Nurs Pract 2017 Oct;23(5):e12577. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    50. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006 Jan;3(2):77-101. [CrossRef]
    51. Kleyman EZ, Tabaei S. Information literacy needs in graduate-level health sciences education. J Physician Assist Educ 2012;23(2):36-41. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    52. Saparova D, Nolan NS. Evaluating the appropriateness of electronic information resources for learning. J Med Libr Assoc 2016 Jan;104(1):24-32 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    53. Purcell K, Brenner J, Rainie L. Pew Research Center. 2012. Search Engine Use 2012   URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/03/09/search-engine-use-2012/ [accessed 2019-02-05]
    54. Lauckner C, Hsieh G. The Presentation of Health-Related Search Results and Its Impact on Negative Emotional Outcomes. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2013 Presented at: CHI'13; April 27-May 2, 2013; Paris, France. [CrossRef]
    55. Lee K, Hoti K, Hughes JD, Emmerton LM. Consumer use of 'Dr Google': a survey on health information-seeking behaviors and navigational needs. J Med Internet Res 2015 Dec 29;17(12):e288 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    56. Rieger O. Search engine use behavior of students and faculty: user perceptions and implications for future research. First Monday 2009;14(12):49. [CrossRef]
    57. Spink A, Yang Y, Jansen J, Nykanen P, Lorence DP, Ozmutlu S, et al. A study of medical and health queries to web search engines. Health Info Libr J 2004 Mar;21(1):44-51 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    58. Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS, Algazy JI, Kravitz RL, Broder MS, et al. Health information on the internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. J Am Med Assoc 2001;285(20):2612-2621 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    59. Spink A, Dee C. Cognitive shifts related to interactive information retrieval. Online Inf Rev 2007 Nov 27;31(6):845-860. [CrossRef]
    60. Pickles KJ, Rhind SM, Miller R, Jackson S, Allister R, Philp J, et al. Potential barriers to veterinary student access to counselling and other support systems: perceptions of staff and students at a UK veterinary school. Vet Rec 2012 Feb 4;170(5):124. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    61. Zenner D, Burns GA, Ruby KL, Debowes RM, Stoll S. Veterinary students as elite performers: preliminary insights. J Vet Med Educ 2005;32(2):242-248. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    62. Moffat KJ, McConnachie A, Ross S, Morrison JM. First year medical student stress and coping in a problem-based learning medical curriculum. Med Educ 2004 May;38(5):482-491. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    63. Reisbig AM, Danielson JA, Wu T, Hafen M, Krienert A, Girard D, et al. A study of depression and anxiety, general health, and academic performance in three cohorts of veterinary medical students across the first three semesters of veterinary school. J Vet Med Educ 2012;39(4):341-358. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    64. Kingsley K, Galbraith GM, Herring M, Stowers E, Stewart T, Kingsley KV. Why not just Google it? An assessment of information literacy skills in a biomedical science curriculum. BMC Med Educ 2011 Apr 25;11:17 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    65. Arlt SP. The staircase of evidence – a new metaphor displaying the core principles of evidence-based veterinary medicine. Vet Evid 2016 Jan 22;1(1):1-14. [CrossRef]
    66. Hsu W, Chiang C, Yang S. The effect of individual factors on health behaviors among college students: the mediating effects of eHealth literacy. J Med Internet Res 2014 Dec 12;16(12):e287 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    67. Mesko B, Győrffy Z, Kollár J. Digital literacy in the medical curriculum: a course with social media tools and gamification. JMIR Med Educ 2015 Oct 1;1(2):e6 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    68. Bromme R, Thomm E, Wolf V. From understanding to deference: laypersons' and medical students' views on conflicts within medicine. Int J Sci Educ 2013 Nov 7;5(1):68-91. [CrossRef]
    69. Raes A, Schellens T, de Wever B, Vanderhoven E. Scaffolding information problem solving in web-based collaborative inquiry learning. Comput Educ 2012 Aug;59(1):82-94. [CrossRef]
    70. Kim JY, Lim KY. Promoting learning in online, ill-structured problem solving: the effects of scaffolding type and metacognition level. Comput Educ 2019 Sep;138:116-129. [CrossRef]
    71. Byström K, Järvelin K. Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Inform Process Manag 1995 Mar;31(2):191-213. [CrossRef]
    72. Chemers MM, Hu L, Garcia BF. Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. J Educ Psychol 2001 Mar;93(1):55-64. [CrossRef]


    Abbreviations

    AAVMC: Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges
    EHIL: electronic health information literacy
    EHR: electronic health record
    HIL: health information literacy
    HIO: health information overload
    IO: information overload


    Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 22.02.19; peer-reviewed by R El Sherif, C Mather, JR Bautista; comments to author 11.04.19; revised version received 02.06.19; accepted 21.08.19; published 08.11.19

    ©Nanette Lai, Deep Khosa, Andria Jones-Bitton, Cate E Dewey. Originally published in JMIR Medical Education (http://mededu.jmir.org), 08.11.2019.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Education, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mededu.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.