Search Articles

View query in Help articles search

Search Results (1 to 8 of 8 Results)

Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS


Consolidated Reporting Guidelines for Prognostic and Diagnostic Machine Learning Models (CREMLS)

Consolidated Reporting Guidelines for Prognostic and Diagnostic Machine Learning Models (CREMLS)

Reference 13: What reporting guidelines should I follow for my article? (https://support.jmir.org/hc/en-us/articles/115001575267-What-reporting-guidelines-should-I-follow-for-my-article

Khaled El Emam, Tiffany I Leung, Bradley Malin, William Klement, Gunther Eysenbach

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e52508

Best Practices for Using AI Tools as an Author, Peer Reviewer, or Editor

Best Practices for Using AI Tools as an Author, Peer Reviewer, or Editor

Disclose which generative AI tool was used by attesting to its use, such as stating, “I conducted this review with the assistance of [Product Name, Version, from Company Name, Year].” If no generative AI was used, state in the cover letter of the submission the following: “The author(s) attest that there was no use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technology in the generation of text, figures, or other informational content of this manuscript.” Authors use generative AI at their own risk.

Tiffany I Leung, Taiane de Azevedo Cardoso, Amaryllis Mavragani, Gunther Eysenbach

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e51584

Can AI Mitigate Bias in Writing Letters of Recommendation?

Can AI Mitigate Bias in Writing Letters of Recommendation?

Examples of doubt-raising language include “while she has not done”; “while not the best student I have had”; and “bright, enthusiastic, he responds well to a minimum amount of supervision.” Examples of hedging include “it appears that” or “now that she has chosen,” and an example of faint praise is “she worked hard on projects that she enjoys.”

Tiffany I Leung, Ankita Sagar, Swati Shroff, Tracey L Henry

JMIR Med Educ 2023;9:e51494

Authors’ Response to Peer Reviews of “Representing Physician Suicide Claims as Nanopublications: Proof-of-Concept Study Creating Claim Networks”

Authors’ Response to Peer Reviews of “Representing Physician Suicide Claims as Nanopublications: Proof-of-Concept Study Creating Claim Networks”

If I did a google search or a professional database, I can find many more beyond the selected time periods. I would argue such an approach has a strong time bias and source bias. Do the authors conduct the investigation on a reliable database? Response: Thank you for this observation. As noted in the manuscript, the data source for articles that asserted the claim of interest was a previously published scoping review of the literature about physician suicide.

Tiffany I Leung, Tobias Kuhn, Michel Dumontier

JMIRx Med 2022;3(3):e40158

Women Physicians in Transition Learning to Navigate the Pipeline from Early to Mid-Career: Protocol for a Qualitative Study

Women Physicians in Transition Learning to Navigate the Pipeline from Early to Mid-Career: Protocol for a Qualitative Study

I am in the process of transitioning from early to mid-career. I just completed my transition from early to mid-career. I’m not sure An interview guide was developed by the investigators, who have diverse experiences in academic medicine (TIL, KHW, TLL, GTG, SSP, CYAC), health care administration (SSP), organized medicine (TIL, TLL, CYAC), private practice (TLL), and research (TIL, KHW, GTG, CYAC), including qualitative methods (KHW) (Multimedia Appendix 1).

Tiffany I Leung, Karen H Wang, Tammy L Lin, Geneen T Gin, Sima S Pendharkar, Chwen-Yuen Angie Chen

JMIR Res Protoc 2022;11(6):e38126