e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 4 of 4 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 3 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 1 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
GRADE is not the first nor the only approach for assessing the certainty of evidence and assigning the strength of recommendations. It is, however, the approach used in Cochrane systematic reviews and many clinical practice guidelines. The GRADE approach includes a Summary of Findings (So F) table to make the process of judging evidence and translating it into a recommendation more accessible for a broader audience, primarily for end users—clinicians, patients, and policy makers.
J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e43928
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Digital Biomarker–Based Interventions: Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
Among the several methods for assessing the quality of evidence [20], the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) approach is used most commonly in systematic reviews, health technology assessments, and treatment guidelines [19]. GRADE classifies the quality of evidence into 4 categories from high to very poor [19]. However, poor reporting may limit the assessment of the quality of the evidence presented in systematic reviews.
J Med Internet Res 2022;24(12):e41042
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The State of Evidence in Patient Portals: Umbrella Review
For this purpose, we developed meta-level umbrella review tools, GRADE-UR (Grading of Strength of Evidence for Quantitative Research at the Level of an Umbrella Review) and CERQual-UR (Grading of Confidence in the Evidence of Qualitative Research at the Level of an Umbrella Review), by applying a voting-counting method [38] and adapting GRADE [39-41] and CERQual [42-44] SR evaluation tools. The methodological approach was conceptualized independent from the GRADE working group.
J Med Internet Res 2020;22(11):e23851
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework is a validated evaluation tool used to assess the quality of scientific publications. GRADE was developed by an international group of health professionals, researchers, and guideline developers to standardize the evaluation process of publications [1].
JMIR Med Educ 2018;4(2):e10347
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS