e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 240 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 64 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 48 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 43 JMIR Formative Research
- 20 JMIR Research Protocols
- 9 JMIR Human Factors
- 7 JMIR Mental Health
- 6 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 6 JMIR Cardio
- 6 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 5 JMIRx Med
- 4 JMIR Aging
- 4 JMIR Cancer
- 3 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 3 JMIR Diabetes
- 3 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 2 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 1 Iproceedings
- 1 JMIR AI
- 1 JMIR Medical Education
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 JMIR Nursing
- 1 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 1 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Physical activity was measured using a wrist-worn wearable activity monitor (Fitbit Inspire 2). The active monitor estimates sedentary time (minutes), lightly active time (minutes), fairly active time (minutes), very active time (minutes), calories (kcal), steps (n), and distance moved (m). Steps are calculated by the 3-axis accelerometer, while distance moved is automatically calculated based on the number of steps and the participant’s stride length.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e66750
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Eligible studies involved participants diagnosed with UD, BD, or HC and used portable or wearable digital devices such as smartphone apps, wearable sensors, or audio or visual recordings. The studies were required to either compare digital phenotyping results with diagnostic outcomes from professional medical evaluations, compare UD with BD, or perform a classification task involving UD, BD, and HC.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e72229
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Wearable technology provides a direct means of assessing and monitoring mobility, by gathering continuous information on patients’ physical activities and mobility patterns. This capability would allow practitioners to create and monitor tailored mobility care for each patient, which may improve functional outcomes. Several wearable monitors have been validated in healthy individuals including among older adults living in the community [9,10].
JMIR Aging 2025;8:e64372
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The primary objectives of this pilot study were to evaluate the efficacy of this system in improving exercise capacity and adherence through continuous and interactive communication between health care providers and patients and to clarify the synergistic effects of OLC on the use of wearable devices. We hypothesized that the combination of wearable devices and OLC would result in greater improvements in exercise capacity and adherence than those achieved through the use of wearable devices alone.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e63797
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Health Care 2025: How Consumer-Facing Devices Change Health Management and Delivery
After nearly 15 years of commercial availability, consumer-facing wearable devices are owned by one in three Americans and now have medical-grade diagnostic technology [1]. Since the COVID-19 pandemic especially, these devices have exploded in popularity, offering the average consumer basic information about their health and habits.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e60766
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Wearable devices used in remote health research have been shown to be effective in monitoring older adults with chronic conditions, and patients at risk for cardiovascular events, and in providing accurate assessment, behavior tracking, stress monitoring, diagnosis, disease management, biomarkers, and several other variables [14-16].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e54629
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Similarly to the EPICURE study, Lu et al [7] conducted retrospective analysis on a smaller patient cohort of 23 patients which combined a mixed-methods approach, of retrospective questionnaires and interviews with real time activity sensing using wearable devices. Our results indicate that digital tools can also help to motivate cardiac patients, without exposing patients to additional distress.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e57413
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence has conditionally recommended some wearable devices for remote monitoring of PD. However, the exact role, indication, and type of device is unclear, and evidence on the use of wearable devices is limited [6]. The cost, burden on patients and services, and effectiveness to improve clinical outcomes have not yet been assessed.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e63704
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The requirement of being an exercise graduate reflected concerns over the safety and complexity of participants having to learn exercise in an entirely web-based environment on top of new tasks (eg, wearable device, learning to use the Heal-Me app, nutrition tracking, and participating in home-based digital physical function assessments) all during the time of COVID-19.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e57537
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Wearable devices, including smartwatches, could represent a useful option to estimate daily steps in an unobtrusive, ecological way [15]. Moreover, wearables are widely available on the market, easily used by the general population, and enable unobtrusive continuous long-term data collection [16]. However, since these devices are usually tested in healthy populations, knowledge of the validity and reliability of collected data is generally limited when applied to different groups of patients.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e63153
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS