e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 527 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 134 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 117 JMIR Formative Research
- 45 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 41 JMIR Research Protocols
- 30 JMIR Human Factors
- 22 JMIR Medical Education
- 19 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 17 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 16 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 16 JMIR Mental Health
- 15 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 7 JMIR Aging
- 6 JMIR Dermatology
- 6 JMIRx Med
- 5 JMIR AI
- 5 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 4 Iproceedings
- 4 JMIR Cancer
- 4 JMIR Cardio
- 4 JMIR Serious Games
- 3 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 2 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 1 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 1 JMIR Infodemiology
- 1 JMIR Nursing
- 1 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 1 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
The survey included 17 items similar to the presurvey, with wording slightly modified to ask about experience instead of expectation. The postsurvey included 6 additional open-ended items that asked physical therapists to describe their experience using the ARS, such as situations where the ARS was most useful, weaknesses of the ARS, and recommendations for further development or modifications.
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2025;12:e67440
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This aim was addressed through a convergent mixed methods design: this question was examined quantitatively by changes in (1) subjective patient-reported stress levels on a validated survey, (2) blood pressure (BP), (3) galvanic skin response (GSR), (4) heart rate (HR), and (5) heart rate variability (HRV).
JMIR Cardio 2025;9:e66557
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This study adheres to the EQUATOR CROSS (A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies) guidelines for survey research [48]. The checklist was used to ensure comprehensive reporting of study design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation.
After completing the digital health course, a web-based survey was conducted on the students’ perceptions of digital health using a Webropol survey tool.
JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e67423
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The implementation and impact of the training are measured through website access analytics and responses to survey questions.
The online ADHD training is a psychoeducation program consisting of 2 modules, one on “Understanding ADHD” and one on “the role of the GP in the care pathway.” The training takes approximately 45 minutes to complete and can be accessed freely online (link in [12]; example of an education module page in Figure 1).
JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e59365
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
(D) The browser-based reproschema-ui enables interactive survey deployment and data collection. (E) Survey responses are stored in structured JSON-LD with embedded provenance and links to standardized schema elements.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e63343
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The development and administration of the survey were led by a collaborative team consisting of medical professionals, public health researchers, and experts in implementation science.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e60173
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This study used a mixed methods design, integrating quantitative survey data with qualitative insights from FGDs to enhance understanding of participant preferences. Quantitative reporting in this manuscript follows the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines. Qualitative procedures were guided by the SRQR (Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research) framework. This paper primarily reports the quantitative findings.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e59661
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Self-Determined Health App Evaluation Questionnaire Development: Mixed Methods Study
The user survey was completed anonymously by registered participants who volunteered to take part. No identifying information was collected at any stage, and all respondents provided informed consent before proceeding.
The selection of evaluation criteria was conducted as part of a literature search based on the keywords “Bewertungskriterien Apps Gesundheit” (evaluation criteria health apps) and “evaluation criteria health Apps” in English.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e63739
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Health Information Systems’ Support for Management and Changing Work: Survey Study Among Physicians
The data were collected with a web-based survey between January and March 2021 as a part of the “EHR systems as a tool for physicians 2021” study [21]. An invitation to participate was sent by email to all working-age (aged 65 y and younger) physicians from the Finnish Medical Association’s register. A detailed description of the data collection, measures used in the questionnaire and the evolution of the questionnaire can be found elsewhere [21].
JMIR Med Inform 2025;13:e65913
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Questions from the California Health Interview Survey were used to assess online tool use [39]. Participants were asked 2 dichotomous (ie, yes or no) questions: “Have you used an online tool (eg, mobile apps, texting services, webpages, or forums) to learn about problems with your mental health, emotions, nerves, or your use of alcohol/drugs?”
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e60628
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS