Search Articles

View query in Help articles search

Search Results (1 to 1 of 1 Results)

Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS


Effectiveness of Blended Versus Traditional Refresher Training for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Prospective Observational Study

Effectiveness of Blended Versus Traditional Refresher Training for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Prospective Observational Study

In this study, mandatory retraining was administered every 6 months or 1 year (Figure 1), spanning a comprehensive training regimen conducted over 2 years. In the initial training phase, the participants were assigned to either traditional teaching or blended teaching modes. Learning effectiveness assessments were conducted every 12 months, with a retraining frequency of 6 or 12 months. Before refresher courses but following initial training, each group underwent evaluation at 12 and 24 months.

Cheng-Yu Chien, Shang-Li Tsai, Chien-Hsiung Huang, Ming-Fang Wang, Chi-Chun Lin, Chen-Bin Chen, Li-Heng Tsai, Hsiao-Jung Tseng, Yan-Bo Huang, Chip-Jin Ng

JMIR Med Educ 2024;10:e52230