Search Articles

View query in Help articles search
e.g. mhealth

Search Results (1 to 10 of 94 Results)

Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS

Factors Determining Acceptance of Internet of Things in Medical Education: Mixed Methods Study

Factors Determining Acceptance of Internet of Things in Medical Education: Mixed Methods Study

If the student’s immediate academic circle has a positive view of a particular technology, the student will likely also develop a favorable opinion. Similarly, tech-savvy students tend to have a positive self-perception. Early on in the acceptance of technology, students are usually eager to pioneer using advanced technologies [40-44]. Furthermore, a student’s optimism about technology is linked to their level of involvement in guiding its use.

Khadija Alhumaid, Kevin Ayoubi, Maha Khalifa, Said Salloum

JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e58377

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML
Article has an altmetric score of 1

Prioritizing Trust in Podiatrists’ Preference for AI in Supportive Roles Over Diagnostic Roles in Health Care: Qualitative Interview and Focus Group Study

Prioritizing Trust in Podiatrists’ Preference for AI in Supportive Roles Over Diagnostic Roles in Health Care: Qualitative Interview and Focus Group Study

They were of the opinion that these tasks could be efficiently managed by AI, thereby streamlining the process and improving overall efficiency. However, opinions varied on whether AI can diagnose foot conditions in patients with diabetes. Most participants were of the opinion that AI is incapable to do so, emphasizing the need for physical examinations by human experts to come up with an accurate diagnosis.

Mohammed A Tahtali, Chris C P Snijders, Corné W G M Dirne, Pascale M Le Blanc

JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e59010

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML
Article has an altmetric score of 2

Professionals’ Perspectives of Smart Stationary Bikes in Rehabilitation: Qualitative Study

Professionals’ Perspectives of Smart Stationary Bikes in Rehabilitation: Qualitative Study

Any differences in opinion regarding the codes were resolved through discussion among team members involved in the data analysis process [28]. The frequency of occurrences was categorized as “most” if identified by at least 7 professionals, “some” by at least 3 professionals, and “few” by less than 3 professionals. The credibility of the analysis was ensured through discussions and interactions with the research team throughout the process (preparation, collection, and analysis).

Julie Soulard, Dahlia Kairy, Roua Walha, Cyril Duclos, Sylvie Nadeau, Claudine Auger

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2024;11:e64121

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML
Article has an altmetric score of 1