e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 528 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 138 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 103 JMIR Research Protocols
- 84 JMIR Formative Research
- 31 JMIR Human Factors
- 31 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 20 JMIR Mental Health
- 20 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 13 JMIR Aging
- 13 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 10 JMIR Cancer
- 10 JMIR Medical Education
- 8 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 8 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 5 Iproceedings
- 5 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 4 JMIR AI
- 4 JMIR Nursing
- 4 JMIR Serious Games
- 3 JMIR Diabetes
- 3 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 2 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 2 JMIR Cardio
- 2 JMIR Dermatology
- 2 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 1 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
A cluster design was chosen so that either implementation of the intervention or provision of regular care was similar throughout the teams, as the intervention impacted the caregivers’ work routines. Alternative designs using individual randomization can result in strong contamination effects or hamper proper implementation.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e66389
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In recent years, there has been an increasing number of research and innovation initiatives at national and international levels, driven by high expectations of improving care through the implementation of DNTs [8-10]. However, the rate of successful implementation and sustainable uptake remains rather low, regardless of these efforts [7,11].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e64616
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The most frequently reported negative effect was related to fear of incorrect implementation or understanding of the content and subsequent (subjective) deterioration (14/93, 15.1%). Regarding malpractice, 48.9% (46/94) said the program put too much time or performance pressure on the user and 41.7% (35/84) felt the program did not address personal problems sufficiently. An unethical procedure was reported by 24.7% (22/89) who felt pressured to do things they did not want to do.
JMIR Ment Health 2025;12:e71274
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
While these strategies have shown positive results in improving students’ decision-making skills, their implementation often requires significant resources, such as trained facilitators or access to standardized patients, making them challenging to scale [7]. This highlights the need for alternative approaches that can provide physical therapy students with diverse clinical scenarios to enhance their clinical reasoning in a more accessible and structured manner.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e66126
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation model [12], an instructional design model, offers a structured approach to guide the development and implementation of educational programs but falls short of providing metrics for measuring implementation. Therefore, there is a need for an e-learning implementation outcome framework that provides a comprehensive and objective evaluation of the implementation of e-learning resources.
JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e63882
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
This prospective implementation study with retrospective data analysis (the REQUEST [Remote Monitoring by vi Qtor Upon Implementation on a Surgical Department] trial) will be conducted at a large teaching hospital. All adult patients (aged 18 years and older) admitted to the surgical department for elective procedures will be eligible for inclusion, provided they meet our inclusion criteria and provide informed consent. Patients unable to wear the device or unwilling to participate will be excluded.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e70707
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The review found no studies on the actual implementation of Io T in health care and only a few focusing on Io T adoption. Kronlid et al call for more rigorous empirical research on Io T adoption and implementation, grounded in frameworks that reflect sociotechnical realities.
Other previous research has shown that successful implementation requires consideration of factors beyond technology [21].
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e71546
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Health care provider interviews were completed before TIPS implementation and after the implementation of TIPS. This was done to understand evolving facilitators of and barriers to implementation and understand perceptions around the TIPS program. Preimplementation interviews were also used to inform implementation strategies. All patient interviews were completed after implementation to understand patient experiences with TIPS and perceptions around tele–mental health emergency evaluations.
JMIR Ment Health 2025;12:e72541
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The inconsistent findings across studies underscore the need for a review of existing evidence on the integration of m Health and EMR/EHR and health outcomes, in order to obtain insights and develop practical recommendations for health care policy makers, administrators, and providers, guiding the effective implementation of m Health app data integration with EMR/EHR systems.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e66650
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS