e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 194 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 78 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 18 JMIR Mental Health
- 18 JMIR Research Protocols
- 13 JMIR Medical Education
- 12 JMIR Formative Research
- 8 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 6 JMIR AI
- 6 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 5 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 3 JMIR Human Factors
- 3 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 3 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 3 JMIR Serious Games
- 3 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 2 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 2 JMIR Aging
- 2 JMIR Cancer
- 2 JMIR Infodemiology
- 2 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 2 JMIR Nursing
- 1 JMIR Data
- 1 JMIR Dermatology
- 1 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Based on our shared experience in clinical practice, mental health research co-design and/or participatory involvement in research and building AI-powered products, and on the World Health Organization’s guidance on Ethics & Governance of Artificial Intelligence for Health (2024) [18], we propose that mental health AI chatbots should adhere to a version of the criteria outlined in Table 1.
J Particip Med 2025;17:e69534
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Framing the Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence Concepts and Methods: Scoping Review
The study emphasizes the needs of AI developers and users, addressing aspects such as functionality, social impact, understandability, ethics, privacy, and security. These insights are crucial for developing AI systems that meet diverse stakeholder requirements.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e67350
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Users' Perceptions and Trust in AI in Direct-to-Consumer mHealth: Qualitative Interview Study
This study addressed a supplemental aim to an ongoing study about the ethics of AI use in medicine (NCATS R01-TR-003505) [21]. To accomplish this aim, we conducted semistructured interviews with existing users of AI-m Health apps (N=21) to identify and describe their perspectives relating to ethical dimensions associated with the use of such apps, specifically in the workplace.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e64715
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
ethicsEthics, Privacy, and Legal Issues
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e69341
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Trends in ethics for digital health apps are increasingly focusing on data privacy, security, and legal compliance, but ethical concerns are often underemphasized in quality frameworks [5]. For the purpose of this paper, ethics refers to the moral guidelines that researchers follow to ensure that they treat participants fairly, respect participants’ rights, and prioritize participants’ well-being in the research process [6].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e70711
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The main barriers are validation, usability, utility, and ethics [24]. More global research is still needed to generate more data on the use of AI in medicine. Only after extensive proof of superiority will its use be legalized [25]. Utility refers to the functionality of a tool being studied and improved through research and its use in various functions, while usability refers to the ability of health care professionals to use the tool to achieve satisfactory results [25].
JMIR AI 2025;4:e66552
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The complexity of ethics, lack of targeted guidance for interdisciplinary teams, and absence of comprehensive reviews of evaluation research practices provide the rationale for this scoping review. These issues are explored in detail in the following sections and further elaborated in the proposed review, using evaluations of RPM in cancer and cardiovascular care as practical case studies.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e60849
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Prognostic Disclosure in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Protocol for a Scoping Review
Reference 10: Intended and unintended consequences: Ethics, communication, and prognostic disclosureethics
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e57256
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This human participant research was approved by the appropriate University College Dublin (UCD) research ethics committee (UCD School of Information and Communication Studies Taught Masters Research Ethics Committee).
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e67114
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Reference 17: WHO Code of Ethics(https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/who-code-of-ethics)ethics
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e66639
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS