e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 281 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 96 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 48 JMIR Formative Research
- 30 JMIR Medical Education
- 21 JMIR Human Factors
- 21 JMIR Research Protocols
- 14 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 8 JMIR Cancer
- 8 JMIR Mental Health
- 7 JMIR Dermatology
- 7 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 4 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 3 JMIR AI
- 3 JMIR Aging
- 2 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 2 JMIR Diabetes
- 1 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 1 Iproceedings
- 1 JMIR Cardio
- 1 JMIR Nursing
- 1 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 1 JMIR Serious Games
- 1 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
COPE-NVI-25: Coping Orientation to the Problems Experienced–New Italian Version (25-item); ERQ: Emotion Regulation Questionnaire; GHQ: General Health Questionnaire; GSE: General Self-Efficacy Scale; ITA BUS B: Italian version of the Chatbot Usability Scale (version B); K10: Kessler Psychological Distress Scale; MPFI: Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory; PSS: Perceived Stress Scale; SF-36: 36-Item Short Form Health Survey; SH+: Self-Help Plus; SUS: System Usability Scale; UES-SF: User Engagement
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e53891
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry and Psychology Education: Scoping Review
According to these studies, chatbot-based psychotherapy and psychoeducational tools are beneficial teaching tools, in addition to being successful for patients. When included in clinical simulations, they give students an opportunity to analyze intervention results, gauge the therapeutic tone, and practice making moral decisions.
JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e75238
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The findings from this phase informed the initial design of the chatbot.
Phase 2: prototype testing (June 2023 to July 2023)—this phase corresponded to the “alpha testing” step in the framework. We tested the chatbot prototype with both eligible women and health care professionals, gathering feedback on usability, content design, content comprehension, and acceptability.
JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e70251
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Oncologists were uncertain about who would bear responsibility if patients experienced adverse outcomes after following chatbot recommendations. This led to hesitation in endorsing or recommending them in clinical practice.
For certain, liability is the biggest concern. If a patient follows advice given by AI and something goes wrong, who will be held responsible?
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e71418
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
With safety in mind, the chatbot was preloaded with clinically approved, pedestrianized responses to questions and queries, which were necessary to ensure the user’s safety while using the chatbot. The scope of the chatbot was limited to the resources on the website only [16], to ensure the clinical accuracy and safety of the resources that the chatbot would surface for the user.
JMIR Diabetes 2025;10:e74032
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Few studies have explored on-demand, chatbot-based interventions that incorporate prospection-based techniques, particularly for student populations who may benefit significantly from improved future-oriented thinking.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e74411
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Participants who reside outside Malaysia were excluded because this study aimed to create an AI chatbot that is culturally tailored for MSM living in Malaysia. We recruited 334 participants, who generated 393 interactions with the AI chatbot. An interaction was defined as a contact initiated by a user with the chatbot.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e70034
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Comparisons among the 3 chatbot models (Chat GPT, Assistants API, and Qwen) were conducted using one-way ANOVA. For pairwise comparisons between 2 chatbot models (Chat GPT and Assistants API), a paired t test was applied. A 2-sided P
The interview transcripts were analyzed using an inductive thematic approach to identify common themes and subthemes related to the participants’ experiences with the Neuro Bot [18].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e74299
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A chatbot will be developed and maintained on the Whats App platform due to its wide popularity among local older adults and a user-friendly interface. The architecture of the chatbot system is shown in Figure 2. Users send information to the Whats App instant messaging server, which then delivers the message to the chatbot. The chatbot system processes and sends a message back to Whats App, where users can view the information.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e68796
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
User and Provider Experiences With Health Education Chatbots: Qualitative Systematic Review
Boggiss et al [19] further supported this, noting that nearly all users wanted to customize chatbot interactions.
Trust issues, particularly those related to privacy, hinder adoption. Barnett et al [16] expressed concerns about confidentiality, noting uncertainty regarding who has access to chatbot interactions and thus preferring traditional doctor–patient confidentiality.
Technical issues such as app freezes and connectivity problems were barriers.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e60205
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS