Search Articles

View query in Help articles search

Search Results (1 to 10 of 51 Results)

Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS


Advancing Clinical Chatbot Validation Using AI-Powered Evaluation With a New 3-Bot Evaluation System: Instrument Validation Study

Advancing Clinical Chatbot Validation Using AI-Powered Evaluation With a New 3-Bot Evaluation System: Instrument Validation Study

Artificial intelligence (AI) automation in low- to mid-level tasks like patient education and initial therapy screening emerges as a strategic response to mitigate this shortage, reallocating medical staff to higher-priority tasks [2,3]. The advent of advanced multimodal large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 introduces a paradigm shift, promising scalable, cost-effective chatbot solutions, which are particularly helpful for tasks that require the provider to interact with the patient [4].

Seungheon Choo, Suyoung Yoo, Kumiko Endo, Bao Truong, Meong Hi Son

JMIR Nursing 2025;8:e63058

Automated Process for Monitoring of Amiodarone Treatment: Development and Evaluation

Automated Process for Monitoring of Amiodarone Treatment: Development and Evaluation

In this study, we present a model for the automation of repetitive follow-up of patients with amiodarone treatment. First, we constructed an automated solution including the whole surveillance process, using a robotic process automation (RPA) software tool. We then compared the RPA to standard manual amiodarone follow-up as presently practiced.

Birgitta I Johansson, Jonas Landahl, Karin Tammelin, Erik Aerts, Christina E Lundberg, Martin Adiels, Martin Lindgren, Annika Rosengren, Nikolaos Papachrysos, Helena Filipsson Nyström, Helen Sjöland

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e65473

The Effects of Presenting AI Uncertainty Information on Pharmacists’ Trust in Automated Pill Recognition Technology: Exploratory Mixed Subjects Study

The Effects of Presenting AI Uncertainty Information on Pharmacists’ Trust in Automated Pill Recognition Technology: Exploratory Mixed Subjects Study

Trust in automation, defined as “the attitude that an agent will help achieve an individual’s goals in situations characterized by uncertainty and vulnerability” [26], is one of the most crucial factors determining the use of automation [27,28]. There is a growing body of research examining people’s trust in autonomous and robotic technologies in various domains, including transportation [29-31], health care [32,33], education [34], and defense [35,36].

Jin Yong Kim, Vincent D Marshall, Brigid Rowell, Qiyuan Chen, Yifan Zheng, John D Lee, Raed Al Kontar, Corey Lester, Xi Jessie Yang

JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e60273

Natural Language Processing and Social Determinants of Health in Mental Health Research: AI-Assisted Scoping Review

Natural Language Processing and Social Determinants of Health in Mental Health Research: AI-Assisted Scoping Review

A recent statement by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence highlights the potential of AI in the systematic review process automation [17]. This study was created and revised following the recommendation of PRISMA-Sc R (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) and updated JBI (formerly known as Joanna Briggs Institute) guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews [16,18-20].

Dmitry A Scherbakov, Nina C Hubig, Leslie A Lenert, Alexander V Alekseyenko, Jihad S Obeid

JMIR Ment Health 2025;12:e67192

Use of Web-Based Surveys to Collect Long-Term Pediatric Outcomes in Patients With Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome Treated With Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation: Observational Study

Use of Web-Based Surveys to Collect Long-Term Pediatric Outcomes in Patients With Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome Treated With Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation: Observational Study

The primary outcome of this study was to assess the feasibility of using computer automation to obtain, to the fullest extent, long-term pediatric outcomes from patients who underwent FLP for TTTS at a fetal center (FC) over a 2-year period. Approval was obtained from the Institutional Human Research Ethics Committee (IRB) (HSC-MS-19‐0363), and the study was conducted between June 1, 2019, and September 30, 2020. The IRB determined that our study did not need ethical approval.

Eric Bergh, Kimberly Rennie, Jimmy Espinoza, Anthony Johnson, Ramesha Papanna

JMIR Pediatr Parent 2024;7:e60039