e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 5 of 5 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 1 JMIR Dermatology
- 1 JMIR Formative Research
- 1 JMIR Medical Education
- 1 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 1 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
The potential misattribution of authorship in medical texts—such as research articles, patient information, or promotional materials—has particularly serious implications, as errors or inaccuracies in these contexts can have grave consequences.
JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e62779
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The total proportion of female authorship increased from 41.7% (3896/9344) in 2018 to 45.2% (5214/11,536) in 2022 (r=0.92; Table 1). The percentages of FFAs fluctuated but slightly increased from 45.1% (771/1710) to 47% (924/1964; r=0.61), while the percentage of FSAs trended weakly upward over time, with a peak in 2021 at 36.4% (920/2526) and falling to 34.5% (678/1964) in 2022 (r=0.76).
JMIR Dermatol 2024;7:e50396
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Next to the presentation of scientific results, authorship in academic journal articles is a means for scholars to communicate the intellectual contributions of their work, take public responsibility for it, build reputation among peers, and convey their professional benefits [1]. However, scholars frequently encounter disputes concerning authorship, with the qualification and order of authorship remaining the main controversial issues in most collaborative work worldwide [2].
JMIR Form Res 2022;6(3):e34258
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
We were particularly interested in reporting PPI through authorship; an important aspect of PPI is the inclusion and recognition of contributions to research outputs. Neither GRIPP nor GRIPP2 address best practices on when and how to include patient and public partners as coauthors in primary research. Although the ACTIVE framework identifies “writing and publishing the review” as one stage of potential involvement, it lacks specific guidance on including partners as coauthors.
J Particip Med 2021;13(2):e27141
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Assessment of Health Information About COVID-19 Prevention on the Internet: Infodemiological Study
Two reviewers (HG-I and GJ-T) viewed the links independently, and the following information was extracted from each link: type of authorship (official public health organizations, scientific societies, digital media, libraries, private health care system, articles from biomedical journals, or other), language, country of publication, and recommendations to avoid COVID-19.
JMIR Public Health Surveill 2020;6(2):e18717
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS