Search Results (1 to 10 of 2397 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 927 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 280 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 241 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 222 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 155 JMIR Formative Research
- 141 JMIR Research Protocols
- 74 JMIR Serious Games
- 55 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 41 JMIR Aging
- 33 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 32 JMIR Mental Health
- 29 JMIR Cancer
- 27 JMIR Human Factors
- 25 JMIR Medical Education
- 23 JMIR Infodemiology
- 13 JMIR AI
- 13 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 12 JMIR Diabetes
- 10 Iproceedings
- 8 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 6 JMIR Dermatology
- 6 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 5 JMIR Cardio
- 4 JMIRx Med
- 3 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 3 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 3 JMIR Nursing
- 3 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 2 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 1 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology

Li and Guo [12] constructed a set of online medical service quality indicators for public hospitals in China from the perspective of online and offline integration. The primary indicators and their weights are outcome quality (0.34), process quality (0.26), structure quality (0.22), and integration quality (0.18). Despite the rapid expansion of internet hospitals, existing evaluation frameworks primarily assess service quality and patient satisfaction.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e72931
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

Referring to the study by Li and Wang [26], environmental cues were assessed using 4 items with “yes” or “no” responses, scored as 1 for “no” and 2 for “yes.” A higher score indicated a stronger public perception of external environmental cues.
Based on Saghafi-Asl et al’s study [27], social cues were evaluated using 5 items rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). A higher score suggested that the public received more social cues about maintenance of health behaviors.
JMIR Public Health Surveill 2025;11:e66535
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Application of Large Language Models in Stroke Rehabilitation Health Education: 2-Phase Study
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e73226
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section