Search Results (1 to 10 of 1809 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 538 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 331 JMIR Research Protocols
- 202 JMIR Formative Research
- 127 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 104 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 61 JMIR Mental Health
- 58 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 50 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 44 JMIR Cancer
- 42 JMIR Human Factors
- 30 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 29 JMIR Aging
- 27 Iproceedings
- 20 JMIR Serious Games
- 19 JMIR Diabetes
- 17 JMIR Medical Education
- 16 JMIR Cardio
- 16 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 15 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 15 JMIR Dermatology
- 12 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 9 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 7 JMIR Nursing
- 5 JMIR AI
- 4 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 4 JMIR Infodemiology
- 4 JMIRx Med
- 2 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Primary Care: Multidisciplinary Pilot Implementation Study
JMIR Diabetes 2025;10:e69061
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Recommendations for Successful Development and Implementation of Digital Health Technology Tools
Each numbered step corresponds to a specific recommendation and is accompanied by letter codes indicating the stakeholders directly involved in the project—P: patients and advocacy groups; H: health care providers; R: researchers; D: developers and engineers; M: project managers; B: regulatory bodies and policymakers. The workflow progresses from left to right, with arrows indicating the primary flow between phases.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e56747
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Literature indicates that wrist-worn activity monitors outperform hip-worn monitors when participants walk at speeds of 3-6 km/h [34]. Participants received instructions on how to properly wear the monitor on their nondominant wrist before the assessment. Participants were allowed to remove the Acti Graph during specific activities such as bathing, swimming, and sleeping. They also maintained a daily wear-time log to record the monitor’s on and off times throughout the monitoring period.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e69259
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section