Search Results (1 to 10 of 2722 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 728 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 496 JMIR Research Protocols
- 281 JMIR Formative Research
- 205 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 161 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 110 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 86 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 77 JMIR Mental Health
- 66 JMIR Human Factors
- 58 JMIR Cancer
- 49 Iproceedings
- 48 JMIR Aging
- 44 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 39 JMIR Medical Education
- 36 JMIR Serious Games
- 34 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 33 JMIR Diabetes
- 31 JMIR Dermatology
- 29 JMIR Cardio
- 24 JMIRx Med
- 21 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 14 JMIR AI
- 12 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 10 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 10 JMIR Infodemiology
- 5 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 4 JMIR Nursing
- 4 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 3 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 2 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 JMIR Data
- 1 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

Novo Nordisk (NVO) struggling to meet demand(https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-02-21/novo-s-ozempic-wegovy-shortage-ends-threatening-copycats
JMIR Infodemiology 2025;5:e73619
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

growing share, distinctive profile(https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2011/12/22/women-in-the-u-s-military-growing-share-distinctive-profile
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e73223
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

by the young(https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2016/04/20/rise-in-english-proficiency-among-u-s-hispanics-is-driven-by-the-young
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e69540
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

For example, Katz et al [28] reported that GPT-4’s accuracy rates ranged from 17.42% (n=21) to 74.7% (n=90) across various medical disciplines. In contrast, our study found GPT-4’s accuracy rates ranged more narrowly, from 53.5% (n=704) to 60.35% (n=1076). This discrepancy could be partially attributed to the differing medical disciplines emphasized in each study, as well as variations in question structure.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e64452
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS