Search Results (1 to 5 of 5 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 2 JMIR Medical Education
- 1 JMIR Infodemiology
- 1 JMIR Research Protocols
- 1 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
An expert panel comprising 2 general medicine and medical education physicians, T Shimizu and Y Otsuka, initially reviewed these cases. After deliberation, they selected all 25 cases that exemplified atypical presentations of common diseases. Subsequently, T Shimizu and Y Otsuka evaluated their degree of atypicality and categorized them into 4 distinct levels, using the following definition as a guide: “Atypical presentations have a shortage of prototypical features.
JMIR Med Educ 2024;10:e58758
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section