Search Articles

View query in Help articles search

Search Results (1 to 10 of 1949 Results)

Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS


Consumer-Grade Neurofeedback With Mindfulness Meditation: Meta-Analysis

Consumer-Grade Neurofeedback With Mindfulness Meditation: Meta-Analysis

We conducted 2 different approaches, trim-and-fill, which corrects for publication bias in small samples, and 3-parameter selection models which explicitly model the proportion of studies below a p-threshold. We considered applying p-curve approaches, but they require at least 3 significant findings which was not the case for multiple models. A PRISMA flow diagram is shown in Figure 2 (PRISMA checklist provided in Multimedia Appendix 2).

Isaac Treves, Zia Bajwa, Keara D Greene, Paul A Bloom, Nayoung Kim, Emma Wool, Simon B Goldberg, Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli, Randy P Auerbach

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e68204

A Digital Photo Activity Intervention for Nursing Home Residents With Dementia and Their Carers: Mixed Methods Process Evaluation

A Digital Photo Activity Intervention for Nursing Home Residents With Dementia and Their Carers: Mixed Methods Process Evaluation

Background characteristics of nursing home residents in both the experimental and control groups who completed the semistructured interviews after the 4-week intervention. a Significance level set at P b Chi-square test with Yates continuity correction. c Not applicable. d GDS: Global Deterioration Scale.

Josephine Rose Orejana Tan, David P Neal, Maria Vilmen, Petra Boersma, Teake P Ettema, Robbert J J Gobbens, Sietske A M Sikkes, Rose-Marie Dröes

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e56586

A Web-Based Tool to Perform a Values Clarification for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Design and Preliminary Testing Study

A Web-Based Tool to Perform a Values Clarification for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Design and Preliminary Testing Study

The overall SURE test, saying “yes” to all 4 components, was 61.2% (156/255) for the standard group, 66.5% (145/218) for the visual group, and 67% (134/200) for the visual+VC group (visual vs standard, odds ratio [OR] 1.26, 95% CI 0.86‐1.84; P=.23; visual+VC vs standard, OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.87‐1.90; P=.20).

Michael P Dorsch, Allen J Flynn, Kaitlyn M Greer, Sabah Ganai, Geoffrey D Barnes, Brian Zikmund-Fisher

JMIR Cardio 2025;9:e67956