TY - JOUR AU - Peng, Cynthia R AU - Schertzer, Kimberly A AU - Caretta-Weyer, Holly A AU - Sebok-Syer, Stefanie S AU - Lu, William AU - Tansomboon, Charissa AU - Gisondi, Michael A PY - 2021 DA - 2021/11/17 TI - Assessment of Entrustable Professional Activities Using a Web-Based Simulation Platform During Transition to Emergency Medicine Residency: Mixed Methods Pilot Study JO - JMIR Med Educ SP - e32356 VL - 7 IS - 4 KW - simulation KW - graduate medical education KW - assessment KW - gamification KW - entrustable professional activities KW - emergency medicine KW - undergraduate medical education AB - Background: The 13 core entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are key competency-based learning outcomes in the transition from undergraduate to graduate medical education in the United States. Five of these EPAs (EPA2: prioritizing differentials, EPA3: recommending and interpreting tests, EPA4: entering orders and prescriptions, EPA5: documenting clinical encounters, and EPA10: recognizing urgent and emergent conditions) are uniquely suited for web-based assessment. Objective: In this pilot study, we created cases on a web-based simulation platform for the diagnostic assessment of these EPAs and examined the feasibility and acceptability of the platform. Methods: Four simulation cases underwent 3 rounds of consensus panels and pilot testing. Incoming emergency medicine interns (N=15) completed all cases. A maximum of 4 “look for” statements, which encompassed specific EPAs, were generated for each participant: (1) performing harmful or missing actions, (2) narrowing differential or wrong final diagnosis, (3) errors in documentation, and (4) lack of recognition and stabilization of urgent diagnoses. Finally, we interviewed a sample of interns (n=5) and residency leadership (n=5) and analyzed the responses using thematic analysis. Results: All participants had at least one missing critical action, and 40% (6/15) of the participants performed at least one harmful action across all 4 cases. The final diagnosis was not included in the differential diagnosis in more than half of the assessments (8/15, 54%). Other errors included selecting incorrect documentation passages (6/15, 40%) and indiscriminately applying oxygen (9/15, 60%). The interview themes included psychological safety of the interface, ability to assess learning, and fidelity of cases. The most valuable feature cited was the ability to place orders in a realistic electronic medical record interface. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility and acceptability of a web-based platform for diagnostic assessment of specific EPAs. The approach rapidly identifies potential areas of concern for incoming interns using an asynchronous format, provides feedback in a manner appreciated by residency leadership, and informs individualized learning plans. SN - 2369-3762 UR - https://mededu.jmir.org/2021/4/e32356 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/32356 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34787582 DO - 10.2196/32356 ID - info:doi/10.2196/32356 ER -