TY  - JOUR
AU  - Nicolau, Abel
AU  - Jorge, Inês
AU  - Vieira-Marques, Pedro
AU  - Sa-Couto, Carla
PY  - 2024
DA  - 2024/12/19
TI  - Influence of Training With Corrective Feedback Devices on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills Acquisition and Retention: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
JO  - JMIR Med Educ
SP  - e59720
VL  - 10
KW  - cardiopulmonary resuscitation
KW  - CPR quality
KW  - resuscitation training
KW  - corrective feedback devices
KW  - skills acquisition
KW  - skills retention
KW  - systematic review
KW  - evidence-based research
KW  - meta-analysis
KW  - feedback devices
KW  - PRISMA
AB  - Background: Several studies related to the use of corrective feedback devices in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training, with different populations, training methodologies, and equipment, present distinct results regarding the influence of this technology. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the impact of corrective feedback devices in cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills acquisition and retention for laypeople and health care professionals. Training duration was also studied. Methods: The search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from January 2015 to December 2023. Eligible randomized controlled trials compared technology-based training incorporating corrective feedback with standard training. Outcomes of interest were the quality of chest compression–related components. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. A meta-analysis was used to explore the heterogeneity of the selected studies. Results: In total, 20 studies were included. Overall, it was reported that corrective feedback devices used during training had a positive impact on both skills acquisition and retention. Medium to high heterogeneity was observed. Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that corrective feedback devices enhance skills acquisition and retention over time. Considering the medium to high heterogeneity observed, these findings should be interpreted with caution. More standardized, high-quality studies are needed. Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42021240953; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=240953 
SN  - 2369-3762
UR  - https://mededu.jmir.org/2024/1/e59720
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2196/59720
UR  - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39699935
DO  - 10.2196/59720
ID  - info:doi/10.2196/59720
ER  -