This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Education, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://mededu.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
To assess the utility of wearable cameras in medical examinations, we created a physician-view video-based examination question and explanation, and the survey results indicated that these cameras can enhance the evaluation and educational capabilities of medical examinations.
medical educationmedical technologywearable devicewearable cameramedical examinationexamexaminationexamsexaminationsphysicalresident physicianswearablewearablescameracamerasvideovideosinnovationinnovationsinnovativerecordingrecordingssurveysurveysIntroduction
Wearable devices have been increasingly used in medicine [1]. Wearable video cameras differ from conventional cameras in that they simulate the perspectives of health care professionals rather than the view of observers. In medical education, wearable video cameras have shown their usefulness in patient interviews [2], virtual physical examination training [3], educational live-streaming ward rounds [4], basic clinical procedures (eg, vascular access) [2], and endoscopic and surgical procedures [5,6]. Wearable cameras, capable of capturing highly realistic situations, can be effective in assessing practical knowledge and providing educational feedback. However, they have not been used in medical examinations. This study aimed to examine the utility of wearable cameras in creating examination questions and answers.
MethodsDevelopment of an Examination Question and Its Explanation
We developed a single examination question focusing on physical examination skills for resident physicians. In October 2021, authors YN and TS created a simulated outpatient case of appendicitis: a middle-aged man with abdominal pain and localized peritoneal irritation in the right lower quadrant. A volunteer physician played the role of the simulated patient. A physician examined the patient with a wearable camera on his head, recording physician-patient interactions. A compact wide-angle wearable camera (Insta360 ONE R) was used to reproduce a high-resolution physician view, including peripheral view fields (Figure 1).
Using the recorded footage, we created 5 concise videos (about 10 seconds each) depicting various physical examination scenes, including (1) indirect abdominal percussion, (2) checking peritoneal irritation by coughing in the supine position, (3) direct abdominal percussion, (4) the heel drop test, and (5) abdominal palpation; Multimedia Appendices 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. The examination question asked for the correct sequence of the physical examination. Based on the patient’s position (standing to supine position) and the invasiveness of the examination procedure, 4-2-1-3-5 was considered a correct answer upon the authors’ agreement.
Additionally, we produced an explanatory physician-view answer video in which an experienced physician (TS) explained the proper sequence and key points in abdominal examinations (Multimedia Appendix 6).
Schematic description of (A) recording physical examination with a wearable camera and (B) its recoded image from the physician’s view.
Study Participants, Examination, and Subsequent Survey
The General Medicine In-Training Examination (GM-ITE) for the academic year 2021, a validated nationwide computer-based examination in Japan, was conducted in January and February 2022 [7]. After completing GM-ITE, participants were given the voluntary option to participate in this study on their computer monitors. If agreed, they were requested to answer the question and view the explanatory video. To evaluate the utility of wearable cameras from the examinees’ perspective, participants were asked to complete a subsequent questionnaire survey using the same computers.
Data Analysis
We described participant characteristics, examination results, and survey results using descriptive statistics.
Ethical Consideration
We obtained informed consent from the person who played the simulated patient’s role and all other participants before the examination. All data were anonymized, and no honorarium was provided to participants. This study was approved by the Ethics Review Board of the Japan Organization of Advancing Medical Education (approval number: 21‐10).
Results
A total of 43 resident physicians from multiple Japanese institutions who completed the examination and survey were included. Of these, 28 (65.1%) participants were postgraduate year-1 and 15 (34.9%) were postgraduate year-2 residents; 19 (44%) participants correctly answered the question.
In the postexamination survey, 32 (74%) participants agreed that they could envision real patients better compared to text-based questions (question 1); 26 (61%) were satisfied with the question (question 2); 29 (67%) stated that physician-view videos were more suitable for evaluating clinical competency than observer-view videos (question 3); and 34 (79%) answered that physician-view explanatory video was a more effective educational approach than text-based explanations (question 4; Table 1).
Results of the survey about the examination and explanatory videos.
Survey questions
Total (N=43), n (%)
Question 1: Are you able to envision real patients better with this examination compared to a text-based question?
Strongly agree
11 (26)
Agree
21 (49)
Neutral
5 (12)
Disagree
5 (12)
Strongly disagree
1 (2)
Question 2: Are you satisfied with this question?
Strongly agree
8 (19)
Agree
18 (42)
Neutral
13 (30)
Disagree
4 (9)
Strongly disagree
0 (0)
Question 3: Are physician-view videos more suitable for evaluating clinical competency than observer-view videos?
Strongly agree
13 (30)
Agree
16 (37)
Neutral
11 (26)
Disagree
3 (7)
Strongly disagree
0 (0)
Question 4: Is an explanatory video from a physician’s viewpoint more effective for learning the content than traditional text-based explanations?
Strongly agree
13 (30)
Agree
21 (49)
Neutral
5 (12)
Disagree
4 (9)
Strongly disagree
0 (0)
Discussion
This study used wearable cameras to create examination questions and subsequent answer explanations; the survey suggested the potential utility of physician-view videos in medical examinations.
This study’s results align with previous research, which showed the effectiveness of chest-mounted point-of-view footage over observer-view videos in physical examination training [3]. For teaching physical examination, video-based e-learning was superior to illustrated text-based e-learning [8]. Moreover, a clinical simulation video successfully assessed clinical competencies across multiple domains in resident physicians [9]. Wearable cameras can provide learners with “immersion,” a sense that one is participating in realistic experiences, which enhances situated learning [10]. Physician-view videos of real clinical situations may emphasize diverse (eg, nonverbal) information. Furthermore, physician-view videos can motivate examinees to learn more actively by regarding themselves as practitioners rather than observers.
This pilot study had limitations. We used a simple subjective survey in a small cohort of volunteer participants. Additionionally, the participants’ detailed characteristics were not collected. More quantitative research with objective outcomes will be required to verify the educational value of incorporating wearable cameras into medical examinations.
The authors would like to express their deep appreciation to Dr Soshi Mano for his cooperation in assisting with this study. Generative artificial intelligence was not used in our manuscript. This study was supported by the Health, Labor, and Welfare Policy Grants of Research on Region Medical (21IA2004) from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare (MHLW). The MHLW did not participate in any part of the study process, including the designing, data analysis, data interpretation, review, and approval of the manuscript.
Data Availability
The data used in this study are not available because participants of this study did not consent to public sharing of their data.
FS, TS, KS, and YY received honoraria from Japan Institute for Advancement of Medical Education Program (JAMEP) as General Medicine In-Training Examination (GM-ITE) exam preparers. YN received an honorarium from JAMEP as GM-ITE project manager. YT is the JAMEP director and received an honorarium from JAMEP as a speaker at a JAMEP lecture. KS and HK also received honoraria from JAMEP as speakers at JAMEP lectures.
AbbreviationsGM-ITE
General Medicine In-Training Examination
ReferencesIqbalMHAydinABrunckhorstODasguptaPAhmedKA review of wearable technology in medicineJ R Soc Med2016101091037238010.1177/014107681666356027729595KwonOYOnline clinical skills education using a wearable action camera for medical studentsJ Exerc Rehabil20221218635636010.12965/jer.2244460.23036684536TeitelbaumDXieMIssaMUse of wearable point-of-view live streaming technology for virtual physical exam skills trainingCan Med Educ J202207133646610.36834/cmej.7307635875435MillTParikhSAllenALive streaming ward rounds using wearable technology to teach medical students: a pilot studyBMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn20217649450010.1136/bmjstel-2021-00086435520979HinchcliffMKaoMJohnsonKThe importance of technical skills assessment during an airway foreign body removal courseInt J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol2019021171510.1016/j.ijporl.2018.11.00730579061LeeBChenBRChenBBLuJYGiannottaSLRecording stereoscopic 3D neurosurgery with a head-mounted 3D camera systemBr J Neurosurg20150629337137310.3109/02688697.2014.99766425620087NagasakiKNishizakiYNojimaMValidation of the general medicine in-training examination using the professional and linguistic assessments board examination among postgraduate residents in JapanInt J Gen Med2021146487649510.2147/IJGM.S33117334675616BuchSVTreschowFPSvendsenJBWormBSVideo- or text-based e-learning when teaching clinical procedures? A randomized controlled trialAdv Med Educ Pract2014525726210.2147/AMEP.S6247325152638ShikinoKNishizakiYFukuiSDevelopment of a clinical simulation video to evaluate multiple domains of clinical competence: cross-sectional studyJMIR Med Educ2024022910e5440110.2196/5440138421691DedeCImmersive interfaces for engagement and learningScience20090123235910666910.1126/science.116731119119219